首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Are politicians office or policy motivated? The case of U.S. governors'environmental policies
【24h】

Are politicians office or policy motivated? The case of U.S. governors'environmental policies

机译:政客上任或政策是否积极?美国州长的环境政策案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Are elected politicians primarily motivated by holding office, thus choosing environmental policies accordingly? Or are they motivated by the chance to implement their preferred environmental policies? Do governors have character, in the sense that they promise and implement environmental policies consistent with their own preferences? To answer these questions, we study the differences in environmental spending across both re-electable and lame duck governors from the two main political parties. In our empirical analysis, we make use of parametric and non-parametric regression-discontinuity approaches. While re-electable governors do not set significantly different policies, lame duck governors do. We argue that in the area of environmental policy governors appear to be primarily office motivated and lack character.
机译:民选政治家是否主要是因为担任公职,从而相应地选择了环境政策?还是他们有机会实施自己偏爱的环境政策而受到激励?在他们承诺并根据自己的喜好执行环境政策的意义上,州长是否具有品格?为了回答这些问题,我们研究了来自两个主要政党的连任和and脚的州长在环境支出上的差异。在我们的经验分析中,我们使用了参数和非参数回归-间断方法。虽然可以连选的州长没有制定明显不同的政策,但是la脚的州长却没有。我们认为,在环境政策领域,州长似乎主要是出于办公室动机,缺乏品格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号