首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Green, greener, greenest: Eco-label gradation and competition
【24h】

Green, greener, greenest: Eco-label gradation and competition

机译:绿色,绿色,最绿色:生态标签等级和竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper analyzes two common features of markets in which eco-label programs certify that products are "green": gradation single programs offering multiple certification standards (e.g., platinum, gold, silver) and competition multiple programs vying to certify to their respective standards. We find that, depending on whether programs are sponsored by industry, environmental groups, or a government, they have strikingly different incentives to grade or compete. Industry sponsors are indifferent about both; environmentalist sponsors optimally grade or compete with other environmentalist sponsors only if consumer preferences for green consumption are skewed in a specific way; and government sponsors' decisions depend on the relative importance of private vs. public benefits generated by the green market. We find also that it is no accident that green markets frequently have an environmentalist program competing with an industry one. For each of the cases examined, our analysis is consistent with casual empirical evidence. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文分析了生态标签程序证明产品为“绿色”的市场的两个共同特征:提供多种认证标准(例如,铂,金,银)的分级单一程序,以及竞争争夺其各自标准的多个程序。我们发现,根据计划是由行业,环保组织还是政府发起,它们对成绩或竞争的激励方式截然不同。行业赞助商对两者都漠不关心。仅当消费者对绿色消费的偏爱以特定方式歪曲时,环保主义者的赞助者才能对其他环保主义者的赞助者进行最佳评级或竞争;政府发起人的决定取决于绿色市场产生的私人利益与公共利益的相对重要性。我们还发现,绿色市场上经常有一项与行业竞争的环保计划并非偶然。对于每个检查的案例,我们的分析与偶然的经验证据是一致的。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号