首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Coasean bargaining in the presence of Pigouvian taxation
【24h】

Coasean bargaining in the presence of Pigouvian taxation

机译:在庇古税的情况下进行的科ase讨价还价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Coasean arguments against the Pigouvian perspective are well established. A central tenet in this criticism argues that a Pigouvian tax may be a source of inefficiency: if parties were to bargain in the presence of a Pigouvian tax, (allocative) inefficiencies would occur the so-called Buchanan-Stubblebine-Turvey Theorem. By analyzing a Coasean environment where the appropriation of property rights is costly, we show Coasean bargaining in the presence of a pre-existing (Pigouvian) tax may be superior. This has implications for policy where dual regulatory environments exist, such as regulation at the state and federal level, as well as environmental liability and litigation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:反对庇古观点的科斯教派论点已经建立。这种批评的中心思想是,庇古税可能是效率低下的根源:如果当事各方在存在庇古税的情况下进行讨价还价,就会出现(分配的)效率低下,即所谓的布坎南-斯图宾宾-特维定理。通过分析产权分配成本高昂的Coasean环境,我们显示了在存在预先存在的(Pigouvian)税的情况下进行Coasean讨价还价的行为可能更好。这对存在双重监管环境的政策产生了影响,例如州和联邦一级的监管以及环境责任和诉讼。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号