首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy >Indigenous entrepreneurship in Samoa in the face of neo-colonialism and globalization
【24h】

Indigenous entrepreneurship in Samoa in the face of neo-colonialism and globalization

机译:面对新殖民主义和全球化的萨摩亚土著企业家精神

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe an in-depth study of indigenous Samoan economic systems, to ascertain what aspects of the systems enable community values and innovation; what are the effects of neo-colonial globalisation on the functionality of the systems, and what can be deduced about the best ways to ensure sustainable economic development of Samoan villages in face of globalisation. Design/methodology/approach – Participatory action research has been carried out continuously within two Samoan villages between 1995 and 2006. Grounded theoretical approaches have been critically utilised, based on primary data from within the villages, local Samoan literature and academic literature from multiple disciplines, including human ecology, postcolonial literature; indigenous knowledge (IK); entrepreneurship, and post-Keynesian and development economics. Ethnographic detail is included in the presentation of grounded theoretical constructs. Findings – Community values are incorporated into business activities within the Samoan villages researched. Community values operate at two levels: that of an extended family and of the village comprising of extended families. Different sets of resources are available and managed by extended families and villages. The chief of each extended family is an entrepreneur as well as manager to ensure the economic viability and independence of their family, and that their capital base is enhanced. The chiefs of extended families form a village council which determines how village resources are utilised. The systems, based on IK, are functional to fulfil community values of equity and lack of poverty. Samoan indigenous entrepreneurship operates to ensure the independence of all extended families, including their capacity to be innovative. This appears to be possible because of the customary land tenure system that does not allow alienation of natural capital. Such a conclusion contradicts the commonly expressed view that economic development requires the creation of tradable property rights. Research limitations/implications – Only two Samoan villages were researched in depth. They are both traditional and from the same district. Even though this enables high-quality data to be obtained about indigenous economic systems in Samoan village, it did into provide data about what may be more generally occurring among Samoan villages. Notwithstanding this, data were gained about what are the deep cultural pressures and challenges as Samoan indigenous economic systems face neo-colonial globalisation. Practical implications – In contradiction to what is commonly argued in development economics literature, the research has found that the instituting of tradable property rights is likely to degrade economic development. The reason is because the IK constituting the Samoan indigenous economic systems implicates inalienable property rights for extended families and villages. Even though access to development capital through the opportunity to mortgage property may bring initial increase in economic development, community values to ensure equity and lack of poverty are likely to be compromised. The research concludes that the best option for the sustainable development of Samoan rural villages is to maintain customary land tenure, but to ensure there remains an ongoing emphasis on education, comprising of both IK and all knowledge pertaining to the new global economy and the opportunities it provides. Originality/value – All aspects of the research are original. All data were collected by the author, and all grounded theoretical development was carried out by the author.
机译:目的–本文的目的是描述对萨摩亚土著经济系统的深入研究,以确定系统的哪些方面能够实现社区价值和创新;新殖民主义全球化对系统功能的影响是什么,以及可以推断出面对全球化如何确保萨摩亚村庄可持续经济发展的最佳方法是什么。设计/方法/方法-在1995年至2006年间,在两个萨摩亚村庄中不断进行了参与式行动研究。基于村庄内的主要数据,萨摩亚当地文学和多学科的学术文献,已经扎根地运用了扎实的理论方法,包括人类生态学,后殖民文学;土著知识(IK);企业家精神,以及后凯恩斯主义与发展经济学。人种学细节包括在扎实的理论构想的介绍中。调查结果–所研究的萨摩亚村庄的商业活动中融入了社区价值观。社区价值观在两个层面上运作:一个大家庭的价值观和一个由大家庭组成的村庄的价值观。有不同的资源集,由大家庭和村庄管理。每个大家庭的负责人既是企业家又是管理者,以确保其家庭的经济生存能力和独立性,并确保其资本基础得到加强。大家庭的首领组成了一个村民委员会,该村民委员会决定如何利用村里的资源。基于IK的系统可用于实现社区公平和缺乏贫困的价值观。萨摩亚的土著企业家精神旨在确保所有大家庭的独立性,包括其创新能力。这似乎是有可能的,因为习惯的土地所有制不允许转让自然资本。这一结论与普遍表达的观点相矛盾,即经济发展需要创造可交易的产权。研究的局限性/意义–仅对两个萨摩亚村庄进行了深入研究。他们都是传统的,来自同一地区。即使这样可以获取有关萨摩亚村庄土著经济系统的高质量数据,但它确实提供了有关萨摩亚村庄中更普遍发生的情况的数据。尽管如此,在萨摩亚土著经济体系面临新殖民地全球化的今天,仍获得了有关深文化压力和挑战的数据。实际意义–与发展经济学文献中普遍争论的观点相反,该研究发现,可交易产权的建立可能会损害经济发展。原因是因为构成萨摩亚土著经济体系的IK涉及大家庭和村庄的不可剥夺的财产权。尽管通过抵押财产的机会获得发展资本可能会带来经济发展的初步增长,但确保公平和缺乏贫困的社区价值很可能会受到损害。研究得出结论,萨摩亚乡村可持续发展的最佳选择是维持习惯的土地使用权,但要确保持续重视教育,包括IK和与新全球经济有关的所有知识及其带来的机遇提供。原创性/价值–研究的所有方面都是原创性的。作者收集了所有数据,作者进行了所有基础的理论开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号