...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power >Comparison of Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes and Large Eddy Simulation Computational Fluid Dynamics Methodologies for Air Swirl Fuel Injectors
【24h】

Comparison of Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes and Large Eddy Simulation Computational Fluid Dynamics Methodologies for Air Swirl Fuel Injectors

机译:雷诺平均非稳态Navier-Stokes与大型涡流仿真喷油器的计算流体动力学方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is well documented that various large-scale quasiperiodic flow structures, such as a precessing vortex core (PVC) and multiple vortex helical instabilities, are present in the swirling flows typical of air swirl fuel injectors. Prediction of these phenomena requires time-resolved computational methods. The focus of the present work was to compare the performance and cost implications of two computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methodologies-unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) using a k-e model and large eddy simulation (LES) for such flows. The test case was a single stream radial swirler geometry, which has been the subject of extensive experimental investigation. Both approaches captured the gross (time-mean) features of strongly swirling confined flows in reasonable agreement with experiment. The temporal dynamics of the quadruple vortex pattern emanating from within the swirler and observed experimentally were successfully predicted by LES, but not by URANS. Spectral analysis of two flow configurations (with and without a central jet) revealed various coherent frequencies embedded within the broadband turbulent frequency range. LES reproduced these characteristics, in excellent agreement with experimental data, whereas URANS predicted the presence of coherent motions but at incorrect amplitudes and frequencies. For the no-jet case, LES-predicted spectral data indicated the occurrence of a PVC, which was also observed experimentally for this flow condition; the URANS solution failed to reproduce this measured trend. On the evidence of this study, although k-e based URANS offers considerable computational savings, its inability to capture the temporal characteristics of the flows studied here sufficiently accurately suggests that only LES-based CFD, which captures the stochastic nature of the turbulence much more faithfully, is to be recommended for fuel injector flows.
机译:众所周知,在空气旋流喷油器的典型旋流中,存在各种大规模的准周期性流动结构,例如旋进旋涡芯(PVC)和多个旋涡螺旋不稳定性。对这些现象的预测需要时间分辨的计算方法。本工作的重点是比较两种计算流体动力学(CFD)方法的性能和成本含义-使用k-e模型的非稳态雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(URANS)和此类流动的大涡模拟(LES)。测试案例是单流径向旋流器的几何形状,这已成为广泛实验研究的主题。两种方法均获得了与实验合理吻合的强涡旋受限流动的总(时间)特征。从旋流器内部发出并通过实验观察到的四重涡旋模式的时间动态是由LES成功预测的,但由URANS未能成功预测。对两种流动形态(有和没有中央射流)的频谱分析表明,宽带湍流频率范围内嵌入了各种相干频率。 LES重现了这些特征,与实验数据非常吻合,而URANS预测了相干运动的存在,但是幅度和频率不正确。对于非喷射情况,L​​ES预测的光谱数据表明存在PVC,在这种流动条件下也可以通过实验观察到。 URANS解决方案无法重现此测量趋势。根据这项研究的证据,尽管基于ke的URANS节省了大量计算资源,但它无法充分准确地捕获此处研究的流量的时间特征,这表明只有基于LES的CFD才能更忠实地捕获湍流的随机性,建议用于喷油器流量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power》 |2009年第1期|011502.1-011502.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK;

    Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK;

    Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK;

    Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号