首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Energy Storage >Energy, exergy, enviroeconomic & exergoeconomic (4E) assessment of thermal energy storage assisted solar water heating system: Experimental & theoretical approach
【24h】

Energy, exergy, enviroeconomic & exergoeconomic (4E) assessment of thermal energy storage assisted solar water heating system: Experimental & theoretical approach

机译:能源,Exergy,Enviro经济和Exergo经济(4E)评估热能储存辅助太阳能热水系统:实验和理论方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, exergy, energy, enviroeconomic & exergoeconomic analysis of evacuated tube collector with/without latent heat storage material has been done for different flow rates i.e. 0.13, 0.26, 0.40 & 0.46 LPM. In this manuscript, palmitic acid has been used as a latent heat storage material. The storage material was filled in the annuls between the absorber pipe and heat pipe termed as palmitic acid integrated evacuated tube collector system while another heat pipe based evacuated tube collector system was tested without latent heat storage material termed as evacuated tube collector without storage system. The results of the experimental investigation revealed that daily thermal & exergy efficiencies of palmitic acid integrated evacuated tube collector increased in the range of 36-44% and 28-35% respectively in comparison to evacuated tube collector without storage.Furthermore, storage based evacuated tube collector system mitigated 21-28 tCO(2)/lifetime and 6-8 tCO(2)/lifetime based on environmental and exergoenvimnmental approaches respectively. Whereas, evacuated tube collector without storage mitigated 14-19 tCO(2)/lifetime and 4-6 tCO(2)/lifetime based on environmental and exergoenvimnmental approach respectively. In comparison to collector without storage, the revenue generated by collector with storage was found to be 95-112 $/lifetime and 22-25 $/lifetime higher based on energy and exergy approach respectively.Overall, palmitic acid integrated evacuated tube collector based continuous flow solar water heating system found to be the most promising system comparison to the collector without storage for different selected flow rates of water.
机译:在本研究中,具有/不潜热储存材料的Dreergy,能量,EnviroConomic和Exergo经济分析已经为不同的流速进行了不同的流速,即0.13,0.26,0.40&0.46Lpm。在该稿件中,棕榈酸已被用作潜热储存材料。储存材料在被称为棕榈酸集成抽空管收集器系统的吸收管和热管之间的蓄冷中填充,而另一个基于热管的抽空管收集器系统被测试而没有被称为抽空管收集器的潜热储存材料,而没有储存系统。实验研究结果表明,除了没有储存的情况下,分别的棕榈酸集成抽空管收集器的每日热和漏极效率分别增加了36-44%和28-35%的范围。收集系统分别根据环境和exergoenviMnmental方法减轻21-28 TCO(2)/寿命和6-8个TCO(2)/寿命。然而,除了基于环境和exergoenvimnmental方法的情况下,抽空的管收集器没有储存14-19吨(2)/寿命和4-6个TCO(2)/寿命。与没有存储的收集器相比,收集器带有存储器产生的收入分别是95-112 $ /寿命,基于能量和暴露的方法,棕榈酸集成抽空管收集器的连续达到95-112 $ /寿命和22-25 $ /终身更高流量太阳能水加热系统发现是与收集器的最有希望的系统比较,而无需存储不同的水的水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号