首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Energy Storage >Energy, Exergy, and Economic analysis of low thermal conductivity basin solar still integrated with Phase Change Material for energy storage
【24h】

Energy, Exergy, and Economic analysis of low thermal conductivity basin solar still integrated with Phase Change Material for energy storage

机译:低导热系盆太阳能的能量,高度和经济分析仍然与储能储存相变材料集成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Latent heat energy storage material has been used by many researchers to achieve an enhancement in the yield of solar still. However, the poor thermal conductivity of Phase Change Materials (PCM) used in solar still led to slower charge/discharge of the energy stored in it. This led to the dissipation of most of the energy stored in the PCM as losses happening in the solar still instead of getting converted into useful work. In this study an attempt was made to improve the yield of the solar still incorporated with PCM by using a low thermal conductivity material to construct the basin of the still, thereby reducing the heat loss occurring along the bottom surface and sidewalls of the still. In the present study, the basin of the conventional solar still (CSS) used for experimentation was made of galvanized iron, which was used as a reference still. The other two stills were incorporated with PCM, whose phase change temperature ranges from 58.03 degrees C - 64.5 degrees C. Among the stills incorporated with PCM, the basin of one of the still was constructed using galvanized iron (GIBSS) while the basin of the other still was made using acrylic (ABSS). From the experimentation, it was inferred that the usage of acrylic as basin material helped to reduce the charging span of the PCM but also delayed the discharge time of the PCM, thereby enhancing the yield of the still. The yield of ABSS was 4.36 L/m(2)/day, which was 10.1% and 19.1% higher than GIBSS and CSS respectively. Meanwhile, the exergy efficiency of ABSS was 3.46% and that of CSS and GIBSS were 3.56% and 2.99% respectively. The cost per liter of water produced by CSS, GIBSS, and ABSS was found to be (sic)0.67, (sic)1.09, and (sic)1.23 respectively.
机译:许多研究人员使用潜热能储存材料来实现太阳能产量的增强。然而,太阳能中使用的相变材料(PCM)的导热性差仍然导致储存的能量较慢/放电。这导致耗散存储在PCM中的大多数能量,因为太阳中发生的损失仍然不是转换成有用的工作。在该研究中,通过使用低热导率材料来改善太阳的产量来提高太阳的产量,以构造静止的盆地,从而减少沿着静止的底表面和侧壁发生的热量损失。在本研究中,用于实验的常规太阳能静止(CSS)的盆地由镀锌铁制成,仍然是参考。另外两个静止剂与PCM融入,其相变温度范围为58.03摄氏度C - 64.5℃。在与PCM的静止体中,其中一个仍然是使用镀锌铁(GIBs)的池中的池中构建其他仍然是使用丙烯酸(ABS)制造的。从实验中推断出丙烯酸作为盆材料的用法有助于降低PCM的充电跨度,但也延迟了PCM的放电时间,从而提高了静止的产量。 ABS的产量为4.36L / m(2)/天,分别比GIBs和CSS高10.1%和19.1%。同时,ABS的漏洞效率为3.46%,CSS和GIBs的效率分别为3.56%和2.99%。 CSS,GIBs和ABS产生的每升水的成本分别是(SiC)0.67,(SiC)1.09和(SiC)1.23。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号