首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Electronic Packaging >Examination of Consistent Application of Interfacial Fracture Energy Versus Mode- Mixity Curve for Delamination Prediction
【24h】

Examination of Consistent Application of Interfacial Fracture Energy Versus Mode- Mixity Curve for Delamination Prediction

机译:界面断裂能与模态-混合曲线一致用于分层预测的检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Experimentally characterized critical interfacial fracture energy is often written as an explicit trigonometric function of mode-mixity and is used to determine whether an interfacial crack will propagate or not under given loading conditions for an application. A different approach to assess whether an interfacial crack will propagate is to employ a failure locus consisting of the critical fracture energies corresponding to different fracture modes, represented by an implicit formulation. Such a failure locus can be linear, elliptical, among other shapes. As it is nearly impossible to obtain isolated G_(IC) or G_(IIC) values through experimentation, extrapolations are used to determine these two extreme values based on intermediate experimental data. However, the magnitude of these extreme values as well as the shape of the two forms of failure curves are at risk of being inconsistent should proper care not be taken. An example of such an inconsistency would be to use a trigonometric formulation to obtain the extreme values through extrapolation and then employ those values in simulation through an elliptical failure. In this work, we have employed a series of commonly used interfacial fracture energy measurement techniques over a range of mode-mixities for a metal/polymer interface to demonstrate the potential discrepancy in the two approaches and to underscore the need for a consistent approach in evaluating interfacial crack propagation.
机译:实验表征的临界界面断裂能通常被写为模式混合的显式三角函数,并用于确定在给定的载荷条件下界面裂纹是否会扩散。评估界面裂纹是否会传播的另一种方法是采用由对应于不同断裂模式的临界断裂能组成的失效轨迹,该断裂能由隐式公式表示。这样的失效轨迹可以是线性的,椭圆的以及其他形状。由于几乎不可能通过实验获得孤立的G_(IC)或G_(IIC)值,因此可以使用外推法根据中间实验数据确定这两个极值。但是,如果不采取适当的措施,这些极值的大小以及两种形式的失效曲线的形状都可能存在不一致的风险。这种不一致的一个例子是使用三角公式通过外推获得极值,然后通过椭圆故障在仿真中采用这些值。在这项工作中,我们在金属/聚合物界面的多种模式混合下采用了一系列常用的界面断裂能测量技术,以证明这两种方法之间的潜在差异,并强调了在评估时需要采用一致的方法界面裂纹扩展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号