【24h】

Modelling Elections in the Caucasus

机译:高加索地区选举建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper constructs formal stochastic models of the elections in Georgia in 2008 and in Azerbaijan in 2010. The models include various kinds of valence, where valence is defined as being associated with the non-policy considerations involving the electoral perceptions of party leaders. Valences can be (i) exogenous, held by all members of the electorate, giving an estimate of the perceived “quality”of the political leaders, and empirically estimated by the intercepts in a spatial model; (ii) sociodemographic, associated with the various propensities of subgroups in the polity to choose one candidate over another.We consider logit models of electoral choice, involving these valences, as well as spatial components derived from policy differences between voters' and candidates' positions. We compute the “equilibrium” vote maximizing positions of the candidates or parties in the two elections and show that these involved divergence from the electoral center.We argue that oppositional candidates faced different political quandaries in the two countries. In Georgia the opposition candidates had low valences and were associated with relatively non-centrist policy positions. In Azerbaijan the survey we used indicates that there was a degree of political apathy, due to the perception that the election would not be democratic. This made it difficult for opposition candidates to offer credible political competition to the dominant party of the president.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2012.666554
机译:本文构建了2008年格鲁吉亚和2010年阿塞拜疆选举的正式随机模型。这些模型包括各种化合价,其中化合价被定义为与涉及政党领导人选举观念的非政治因素相关联。价可以是(i)外来的,由选民的所有成员持有,可以估算出政治领导人的感知“素质”,并可以通过空间模型中的截距来凭经验估算; (ii)社会人口统计学,与政体中各亚组选择一名候选人的倾向有关。 。我们计算了两次选举中最大化候选人或政党立场的“平衡”投票,并表明这与选举中心存在分歧。我们认为,反对派候选人在两国面临着不同的政治困境。在佐治亚州,反对派候选人的价格很低,而且与非中心派政策立场有关。在阿塞拜疆,我们使用的调查表明,由于人们认为选举将不是民主的,因此存在一定程度的政治冷漠。这使得反对派候选人很难向总统的执政党提供可信的政治竞争。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious ,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2012.666554

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号