...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal Economics & Management Strategy >Peer-to-peer sharing in the lodging market: Evaluating implications for social welfare and profitability
【24h】

Peer-to-peer sharing in the lodging market: Evaluating implications for social welfare and profitability

机译:住宿市场中的点对点共享:评估对社会福利和盈利能力的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With a focus on the lodging market, we investigate the nature of competition between a peer-to-peer platform and a traditional lodging provider (hotel), in an environment where both possess the market power to affect the final lodging price established in the market. To understand such an environment, we investigate the strategy choices of the three types of players active in this market: the platform, the hotel, and individuals in the population who consider supplying or demanding lodging capacity. We use our analysis to predict how the emergence of the peer-to-peer platform affects the profits of the hotel and the welfare of consumers. We characterize two types of equilibria: Partial Coverage and Full Coverage. The former type arises if each individual's demand for lodging while on vacation is relatively low in comparison to her supply. In this case, the level of demand originating from vacationers is insufficient to make it worthwhile for the platform to lower its service fee in order to attract capacity from every individual in the population. In contrast, when the demand for lodging while on vacation is relatively high, it may become profitable for the platform to implement the Full Coverage equilibrium, in which case every individual supplies lodging capacity to the platform. We demonstrate that the entry of the platform to the market will definitely increase the consumer surplus if the platform chooses to implement the Full Coverage equilibrium. At the Partial Coverage equilibrium, the consumer surplus might actually decline upon the entry of the platform. This might happen because the entry of the platform can sometimes lead to higher lodging prices, and as a result, can hurt individuals when vacationing. Because the entry of the platform raises the income of individuals in the economy, their willingness to pay for lodging while on vacation may rise. Such higher prices may also sometimes lead to higher profits for the hotel, in spite of the competition with the platform. In the special case that individuals experience no disutility when offering a portion of their housing space to the platform because this space has no alternative use for the individual, the entry of the platform will always lead to higher consumer welfare and lower profits for the hotel, irrespective of whether Full or Partial Coverage arises as equilibrium.
机译:着眼于住宿市场,我们研究了点对点平台与传统住宿提供商(酒店)之间竞争的本质,在这种环境下,两者都具有影响市场上确定的最终住宿价格的市场力量。 。为了了解这种环境,我们研究了活跃在该市场中的三种类型的参与者的战略选择:平台,酒店以及考虑提供或要求住宿能力的人群中的个人。我们使用我们的分析预测对等平台的出现如何影响酒店的利润和消费者的福利。我们描述两种类型的均衡:部分覆盖和完全覆盖。如果每个人在度假期间对住宿的需求与其供给相比相对较低,就会出现前一种类型。在这种情况下,来自度假者的需求水平不足以使该平台值得降低服务费,以吸引人口中每个人的需求。相反,当休假期间对住宿的需求相对较高时,平台实现全覆盖均衡可能会有利可图,在这种情况下,每个人都向平台提供住宿能力。我们证明,如果平台选择实施全面覆盖均衡,那么平台进入市场肯定会增加消费者剩余。在部分覆盖平衡下,消费者剩余可能实际上会在平台进入时下降。之所以会发生这种情况,是因为该平台的进入有时会导致住宿价格上涨,从而在度假时伤害个人。由于平台的进入增加了个人经济收入,因此他们在度假时支付住宿费用的意愿可能会增加。尽管与平台竞争,但如此高的价格有时可能还会为酒店带来更高的利润。在特殊情况下,个人在向平台提供部分住房空间时不会受到任何用处,因为该空间没有个人使用权,平台的进入总是会导致更高的消费者福利和更低的酒店利润,不论是完全覆盖还是部分覆盖都是平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号