首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economics and business >Predatory lending practices and subprime foreclosures: Distinguishing impacts by loan category
【24h】

Predatory lending practices and subprime foreclosures: Distinguishing impacts by loan category

机译:掠夺性贷款做法和次抵押品赎回权:按贷款类别区分影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A recent dramatic rise in subprime foreclosures has led to calls for restrictions against a range of loan features loosely termed "predatory." Several cities and states have enacted regulations to curb predatory practices, and some advocacy groups endorse action at the federal level. Using data on subprime refinance and purchase mortgages from the Chicago metropolitan area, I examine the impact of long prepayment penalty periods, balloon payments and reduced documentation on the probability of foreclosure. Results suggest that the relationship between these loan features and foreclosure rates is much more complicated than the arguments for restricting their use assume.
机译:次级抵押品赎回权的最近急剧上升,导致人们呼吁限制一系列宽松地称为“掠夺性”贷款特征。一些城市和州已经颁布法规来遏制掠夺性行为,一些倡导团体也认可了联邦一级的行动。我使用有关次级抵押贷款的数据以及从芝加哥市区购买抵押贷款的数据,研究了预付罚款期长,大笔还款以及减少的文件对止赎的可能性的影响。结果表明,这些贷款特征与止赎率之间的关系比限制其使用的假设要复杂得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号