首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >Approaches of the Austrian School to the Soziale Frage before World War Ⅰ - Wieser and Boehm-Bawerk
【24h】

Approaches of the Austrian School to the Soziale Frage before World War Ⅰ - Wieser and Boehm-Bawerk

机译:第一次世界大战前奥地利学派对索济亚热战的态度-Wieser和Boehm-Bawerk

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The paper aims to provide an overview of the Austrian School's approaches to the social question before World War Ⅰ. Design/methodology/approach - The paper takes the form of a comparative study. Findings - In his contributions Friedrich von Wieser supported co-operative associations as an organizational form of big enterprise to be used as instruments to ameliorate the social condition of workers; and who dealt with issues such as private ownership of the means of production and economic inequality, impact of collective bargaining on wage formation, and public economy, where he discussed the contribution of public sector production to social value. Further reports on Boehm-Bawerk's essay on disadvantageous consequences of free competition where he came to the conclusion that free competition in reality does not maximize national economic welfare, without, however, drawing concrete policy consequences from his findings. As Austria's finance minister he introduced a modestly progressive income tax early in the twentieth century. Later, in his essay "Control or economic law" he took a more reserved position with respect to the possibilities of correcting ore modifying outcomes of the market process. Practical implications - The paper illustrates that redistribution can enhance economic welfare. Originality/value - Calls back to memory that opinions of the first generation of the Austrian School (Wieser, Boehm-Bawerk) were different from Ludwig Mises' positions expressed in Die Gemeinwirtschaft that all measures of social policy are aimed at the destruction of the free market economy, which later came to be considered as the dominant position of the Austrian School towards the social question.
机译:目的-本文旨在概述第一次世界大战前奥地利学派处理社会问题的方法。设计/方法/方法-本文采用比较研究的形式。调查结果-弗里德里希·冯·威瑟(Friedrich von Wieser)在他的贡献中支持合作社协会作为大企业的组织形式,被用作改善工人社会状况的工具;他讨论了诸如生产资料的私有制和经济不平等,集体谈判对工资形成的影响以及公共经济等问题,并在其中讨论了公共部门生产对社会价值的贡献。关于Boehm-Bawerk关于自由竞争的不利后果的论文的进一步报道,他得出的结论是,现实中的自由竞争并不能最大程度地提高国民经济福利,但是没有从他的发现中得出具体的政策后果。作为奥地利财政部长,他在20世纪初提出了适度的累进所得税。后来,在他的“控制法或经济法”一文中,他在纠正矿石或修改市场过程结果的可能性方面持更为保留的立场。实际意义-本文说明重新分配可以提高经济福利。原创性/价值-让我们回想起第一代奥地利学派的观点(维瑟,勃姆·巴维克),与路德维希·米塞斯在《经济时代》中表达的立场不同,即社会政策的所有措施都旨在破坏自由。市场经济,后来被认为是奥地利学派在社会问题上的主导地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号