首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >An error-correction modeling of US consumer spending: are there asymmetries?
【24h】

An error-correction modeling of US consumer spending: are there asymmetries?

机译:美国消费者支出的错误校正模型:是否存在不对称性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate four possible asymmetries in US aggregate consumption and its major components (durables, non-durables, and services) for the period 1990-2013. Understanding the asymmetric behavior of the components is important since the impact of monetary policy on separate consumer spending categories may differ substantially. Design/methodology/approach - The authors first employ stationarity and cointegration tests to specify and estimate the long-run equilibrium relationship between consumer spending and such variables as disposable income, consumer sentiment, and the expected real interest rate. The authors then specify a structural error-correction model for each spending category to simultaneously investigate such possible asymmetries due to the ratchet effect, psychological negativity bias, interest rate effect, and varying degree of adjustment in eliminating disequilibrium defined as the gap between actual and desired spending. Findings - First, consumption and its major components all display asymmetric behavior consistent with psychological negativity bias. Second, consumer spending on durable goods also displays asymmetries consistent with both the ratchet effect and the interest rate effect. Third, non-durables respond asymmetrically to disequilibrium; consumers adjust (increase) spending on non-durables only when actual spending is below desired spending on non-durable goods. Fourth, services also respond asymmetrically to disequilibrium; consumers adjust (reduce) spending on services only when actual spending is above desired spending on services. Originality/value - This study provides new insight on the asymmetric behavior of consumer spending. The authors believe that the findings should help with macroeconomic policymaking when such indicators as income, consumer sentiment, and expected real interest rates display significant variations.
机译:目的-本文的目的是调查1990年至2013年期间美国总消费及其主要组成部分(耐用品,非耐用品和服务)中的四种可能的不对称性。理解组成部分的不对称行为非常重要,因为货币政策对不同的消费者支出类别的影响可能存在很大差异。设计/方法/方法-作者首先采用平稳性和协整检验来指定和估计消费者支出与可变量收入,消费者情绪和预期实际利率等变量之间的长期均衡关系。然后,作者为每种支出类别指定一个结构误差校正模型,以同时研究由于棘轮效应,心理消极偏见,利率效应以及消除不平衡而进行的不同程度的调整而导致的这种不对称性(定义为实际与期望之间的差距)开支。发现-首先,消费及其主要成分均表现出与心理消极偏见一致的不对称行为。其次,消费者在耐用品上的支出也表现出与棘轮效应和利率效应一致的不对称性。第三,非耐用品对不平衡的反应不对称。只有当实际支出低于非耐用品的期望支出时,消费者才调整(增加)非耐用品的支出。第四,服务对不平衡的反应也不对称。消费者仅在实际支出高于期望的服务支出时才调整(减少)服务支出。原创性/价值-这项研究为消费者支出的不对称行为提供了新的见解。作者认为,当收入,消费者信心和预期实际利率等指标出现显着差异时,这些发现应有助于宏观经济决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号