首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >Resource misallocation and production inefficiency: Estimating cross-country differences in macroeconomic performance
【24h】

Resource misallocation and production inefficiency: Estimating cross-country differences in macroeconomic performance

机译:资源配置不当和生产效率低下:估算宏观经济绩效中的跨国差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PurposeRecent studies have linked differences in aggregate productivity to misallocation of resources across firms. In contrast, the purpose of this paper is to study the macroeconomic performance of OECD economies from a production efficiency point of view and estimated the determinants of (in)efficiency with particular emphasis on misallocation of labor.Design/methodology/approachFollowing the pioneering work of Battese and Coelli, the authors proposed a parametric methodology to construct a world frontier that serves as a benchmark to compare the relative position of each country. The non-negative technical inefficiency effects are assumed to be a function of explanatory variables. By doing this, determinants of technical inefficiency are explicitly introduced in the model.FindingsThe results revealed that OECD countries to operate efficiently should expand their aggregate output by 22.6 percent without consuming more resources. A novel finding is that higher skill mismatch is associated with higher production inefficiency. Conversely, more flexible labor markets, and better management and human resource practices, lowered the inefficiency in production. The paper also analyzed the underlying factors driving skill misallocation in the job market. In this regard, a well-functioning education and training system and greater flexibility in the determination of wages are associated with lower levels of mismatch between the skills of individuals and those required by the jobs.Practical implicationsThe measurement of the productive efficiency of an economy (or country) is crucial to governments. It is important to know how far a given economy can be expected to increase its output by simply increasing its efficiency, without absorbing further resources. In other words, it is relevant to know if a country could produce more with the same resources and, therefore, could increase per capita income and welfare. In this type of analysis what also matters is to identify what factors or variables explain that greater or lesser ability of a country to convert its resources into aggregate production.Originality/valueMuch research on efficiency measurement has focused on the firm or industry level, mainly to study the efficiency of financial institutions. Efficiency studies using aggregated data across countries are rare in the literature of efficiency. This paper aimed to contribute to filling that shortage evaluating the macroeconomic performance of a sample of OECD countries from the production efficiency point of view.
机译:目的 n最近的研究已将总生产率的差异与公司间资源的错误分配联系起来。相比之下,本文的目的是从生产效率的角度研究OECD经济体的宏观经济绩效,并估计效率(效率)的决定因素,并特别强调劳动力的分配不当。 n设计/方法论/方法 n Battese和Coelli的开创性工作,作者提出了一种参数化方法来构建世界边界,以此作为比较每个国家相对地位的基准。假定非负技术效率低下的影响是解释变量的函数。通过这样做,模型中明确引入了技术效率低下的决定因素。 n调查结果 n结果表明,经合组织国家要有效运作,应在不消耗更多资源的情况下将其总产出增加22.6%。一个新颖的发现是,更高的技能不匹配与更高的生产效率相关。相反,更灵活的劳动力市场以及更好的管理和人力资源实践降低了生产效率。本文还分析了导致劳动力市场技能错位的潜在因素。在这方面,一个运作良好的教育和培训系统以及确定工资方面的更大灵活性,可以降低个人技能与工作所需技能之间的不匹配程度。 n实践意义 n衡量生产效率的方法经济(或国家)对政府至关重要。重要的是要知道,只要不增加资源,就可以通过简单地提高效率来提高给定经济的产出。换句话说,有必要知道一个国家是否可以用相同的资源生产更多的产品,从而可以增加人均收入和福利。在这种类型的分析中,重要的是要确定哪些因素或变量可以解释一个国家将其资源转换为总生产的能力的提高或降低。 n原创性/价值 n关于效率衡量的许多研究都集中在公司或行业层面,主要研究金融机构的效率。效率文献中很少使用跨国家的汇总数据进行效率研究。本文旨在从生产效率的角度帮助弥补这一短缺,以评估经合组织国家样本的宏观经济绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号