首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Policy Reform >Liberty, equality, and impossibility: some general results in the space of ‘soft’ preferences
【24h】

Liberty, equality, and impossibility: some general results in the space of ‘soft’ preferences

机译:自由,平等和不可能:在“软”偏好空间中的一些普遍结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper is concerned with examining the mutual compatibility of the ethical principles of equity and liberty in a social choice framework of ordinally formulated vague preferences. With sufficiently weakened versions of the liberty and equity principles, one can secure an existence result in a ‘relation‐functional’ setting. However, difficulties tend to re‐appear in a ‘choice‐functional’ setting, when one subscribes to the notion that while preference may be vague, choice must perforce be exact.View full textDownload full textKeywordssoft binary preference relation, soft extended binary preference relation, modified equity, minimal liberalism, generalized soft aggregation rule, H‐rationalizability of a choice functionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2010.523970
机译:本文关注的是在通常制定的模糊偏好的社会选择框架中研究公平与自由伦理原则的相互兼容性。在充分削弱自由和公平原则的基础上,人们可以确保存在“关系”功能的存在结果。但是,困难往往会在“选择”功能设置中重新出现,当人们赞同这样的观念时,虽然偏好可能含糊不清,但选择必须准确无误。查看全文下载全文textKeywordssoft二进制偏好关系,软扩展二进制偏好关系,修改后的股权,最小自由度,广义软聚合规则,选择函数的H合理性相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,twitter,technorati,delicious ,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2010.523970

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号