首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >The Economic Case for Mergers: Old, New, Borrowed, and Blue
【24h】

The Economic Case for Mergers: Old, New, Borrowed, and Blue

机译:合并的经济案例:旧的,新的,借来的和蓝色的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I have tried to examine how three different economic perspectives look at the firm and mergers to contextualize the rich understanding the women I interviewed had of mergers. In particular I have highlighted how the three perspectives look at knowledge, time lags, goals, and the relationship between the firm and the individual. I have argued that both neoclassical economics and NIE leave aside what are important elements of firms generally and mergers specifically. Both disciplines cause the gaze to be turned from what are interesting and important features of mergers and turn attention toward the unobservable preferences of firms and individuals. While both theories have interesting elements, neoclassical economics, for instance, points out the importance of separation of ownership and control and NIE highlights the importance of bounded rationality and transaction costs, it is only under IE analysis we can start to answer the questions, What happens when firms merge? and Why do mergers fail so often? with anything like satisfaction. The difference in how the three theories treat change in general and mergers in particular is not just of academic interest―mergers are increasingly common, and many workers will experience a merger or acquisition within their working lifetime. So having a feel for the effects of mergers will give us a feel for the future of merged firms but also the experience of work for an increasing number of people. IE helps situate the experiences of the employees I interviewed, but none of the theories have a good explanation as to why firms merged in the first place. A lot more work needs to be done on an adequate explanation of and for mergers. Further empirical enquiry will help us understand the reason for and the consequences of firms marrying, but so too will borrowing from other disciplines (for instance, psychology, management, sociology). The theory that emerges from this process may have something old, new, borrowed, and blue, but it should be a far better description of the reality of firms marrying.
机译:我试图研究如何从三种不同的经济角度看待公司和兼并,以使我采访的女性对兼并的深刻理解成为背景。我特别强调了三种观点如何看待知识,时滞,目标以及企业与个人之间的关系。我认为,新古典经济学和NIE都忽略了公司总体上重要的要素,特别是兼并中的重要要素。两种学科都将目光从并购的有趣和重要特征转向,将注意力转向企业和个人无法观察到的偏好。尽管这两种理论都有有趣的元素,例如新古典经济学指出了所有权和控制权分离的重要性,而NIE则强调了有限理性和交易成本的重要性,只有在IE分析下,我们才能开始回答这些问题:公司合并时会发生什么?为什么合并经常失败?任何满意的事情。三种理论如何看待总体变化,特别是兼并的变化,不仅具有学术上的意义,而且兼并越来越普遍,许多工人将在其工作寿命内经历兼并或收购。因此,对合并的影响有一种感觉,这将使我们对合并后的公司的未来有一种感觉,但同时也给越来越多的人带来了工作经验。 IE有助于了解我采访过的员工的经历,但是没有一个理论能很好地解释为什么企业首先合并。要对兼并进行充分的解释,还需要做更多的工作。进一步的实证研究将帮助我们理解企业结婚的原因和后果,但是从其他学科(例如,心理学,管理学,社会学)的借用也是如此。从这个过程中产生的理论可能有一些旧的,新的,借来的和蓝色的东西,但它应该是对公司结婚现实的更好描述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号