首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >Institutionalists as Dissenters: Why Were Institutionalists So Dissatisfied with Economics During the Post-War Period
【24h】

Institutionalists as Dissenters: Why Were Institutionalists So Dissatisfied with Economics During the Post-War Period

机译:制度主义者作为异议者:为什么战后时期制度主义者对经济学如此不满意

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the 1940s and 1950s, institutionalist economists rapidly lost their influence over American economics. In parallel, a new mainstream emerged, and the institutionalists were extremely dissatisfied with the path taken by the economic science. We analyze the opinions and feelings about this context to shed light on the institutionalists' understanding of the new mainstream economics. We construct a historical account of the institutionalists' dissatisfaction with post-war economics based on archival material from the personal papers of Allan Gruchy, John Gambs, John Blair, and Clarence Ayres. In the period analyzed, the economists, who would later found the Association for Evolutionary Economics, acted as dissenters rather than institutionalists. In part, this explains the pluralistic path that the association has followed ever since its foundation.
机译:在1940年代和1950年代,制度主义经济学家迅速失去了对美国经济学的影响。同时,出现了新的主流,制度主义者对经济科学的发展道路极为不满。我们分析了对这种情况的看法和感受,以阐明制度主义者对新主流经济学的理解。我们根据艾伦·格鲁奇(Allan Gruchy),约翰·甘布斯(John Gambs),约翰·布莱尔(John Blair)和克拉伦斯·艾尔斯(Clarence Ayres)的个人论文中的档案材料,对制度主义者对战后经济学的不满进行了历史描述。在所分析的时期内,后来成立了进化经济学协会的经济学家们是持不同政见者而不是制度主义者。在某种程度上,这解释了该协会自成立以来所遵循的多元化道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号