首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >Contemporary China's Rural Landownership with Reference to Antony M. Honore's Concept of Ownership
【24h】

Contemporary China's Rural Landownership with Reference to Antony M. Honore's Concept of Ownership

机译:从安东尼·奥诺妮的所有权概念看当代中国的农村土地所有权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article analyses the property rights that Chinese peasants have under the present Household Responsibility System (HRS) using Antony M. Honore's work on ownership, especially his analysis of eleven standard incidents of the full liberal concept of ownership. It confirms Honore's insight that these standard incidents can be divided among two or more persons, and thus there are different types of property rights which are variants and alternatives to the liberal type of property rights. This article also confirms that the Chinese land system is a real alternative to the full liberal concept of ownership. The current Chinese land system is alleged to be unclear and insecure because it is not the kind of private ownership that neoliberals champion. In the tradition of the bundle of rights theory, it is helpful to use Honore's concept of ownership, rather than Harold Demsetz's type of property rights, to understand the current Chinese system.
机译:本文使用安东尼·奥诺尔(Antony M. Honore)关于所有权的工作,特别是他对完全自由主义所有权概念的十一个标准事件的分析,分析了在现行家庭联产承包责任制(HRS)下中国农民的财产权。它证实了Honore的见识,即这些标准事件可以在两个或两个以上的人之间进行划分,因此存在不同类型的财产权,这是自由主义财产权的变体和替代。本文还证实,中国的土地制度是完全自由的所有权概念的真正替代。据称,当前的中国土地制度尚不清楚和不安全,因为它不是新自由主义者所拥护的那种私有制。在权利捆绑理论的传统中,使用Honore的所有权概念(而不是Harold Demsetz的产权类型)有助于理解当前的中国制度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号