首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >Considerations on Inequality, Corporate Governance, and Financialization
【24h】

Considerations on Inequality, Corporate Governance, and Financialization

机译:关于不平等,公司治理和金融化的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Disjunctures between corporate governance, increasingly dominated by financial considerations, and social inequality have been among the motor forces of current world-wide "populist" voter revolts. This article looks for clues for the relation between economic inequality, corporate governance, and financialization by re-examining the work of Karl Marx and of Adolphe Berle and Gardiner Means. Marx is widely considered, in Japan, to have pointed out that the division of profit into the wages of management and the profit of enterprise is considered as a path to the association. However, this general interpretation in Japan may not be sufficient for capturing capitalism's contemporary reality. This presentation develops an alternative interpretation of this chapter by combining Marx's explanation with the theory of the separation of ownership and management proposed by Berle and Means. We then explore causal relations among income inequality, corporate governance, and financialization.
机译:企业治理之间的分歧,日益受到财务考虑,社会不平等的抵消,目前全球“民粹主义”选民革命的机动力量之一。本文通过重新检查Karl Marx和Adolphe Berle和Gardiner手段,查看经济不平等,公司治理和经济化之间的关系的线索。在日本,马克思被广泛考虑,指出,将利润分为管理工资和企业利润被视为该协会的道路。然而,这一将来在日本的一般解释可能不足以捕获资本主义的当代现实。本演示文稿通过将Marx的解释与Perle和手段提出的所有权和管理层的分离理论相结合,介绍了本章的替代解释。然后,我们探讨收入不平等,公司治理和金融化之间的因果关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号