首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination >Oligopoly firms with quantity-price strategic decisions
【24h】

Oligopoly firms with quantity-price strategic decisions

机译:具有数量价格策略决策的寡头公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An agent-based model is used to determine market equilibrium with price-setting firms in an oligopoly market. The agent-based model is designed to match the experimental rules that Brandts and Guillen (J Ind Econ 55:453–474, 2007) used with human subjects. Their model uses posted prices and advance production of a perishable good. When the marginal cost is zero, the analytical Bertrand solution is almost perfect competition. When the marginal cost is nonzero, the game does not have a theoretical equilibrium in pure strategies. The agent-based model results show that with one or two firms, prices are at or near the monopoly level, which matches the human experiments. With four firms, prices are always at the perfectly competitive level when particle swarm optimization is used. Results using a genetic algorithm, however, are noisier than those using the particle swarm optimization, and the genetic algorithm falls short of the competitive solution. The triopoly market changes from mostly monopoly to a price in between monopoly and perfect competition when a marginal cost is added. The computerized agents tend to overproduce so that profits are negative in the three- and four-firm cases when production is costly. While the prices in the simulation are close to those observed in experiments with human subjects, the inefficiency due to overproduction is much greater in the agent-based model results. This result suggests that human agents are able to reach solutions, perhaps through social norms, that are missed by the simple agent-based rules used here.
机译:基于代理的模型用于确定寡头垄断市场中与定价公司的市场均衡。基于主体的模型旨在匹配Brandts和Guillen(J Ind Econ 55:453-474,2007)对人类受试者使用的实验规则。他们的模型使用公布的价格并提前生产易腐烂的货物。当边际成本为零时,解析的Bertrand解决方案几乎是完全竞争。当边际成本不为零时,博弈在纯策略中不具有理论平衡。基于代理的模型结果表明,对于一个或两个公司,价格处于或接近垄断水平,与人工实验相符。对于四家公司,当使用粒子群优化时,价格始终处于完美的竞争水平。但是,使用遗传算法的结果比使用粒子群优化的结果更嘈杂,并且遗传算法没有竞争解决方案。当增加边际成本时,三方垄断市场从多数垄断变为垄断和完全竞争之间的价格。计算机化的代理往往会生产过剩,因此在生产成本高昂的三,四公司情况下,利润为负。尽管模拟中的价格接近于在人类受试者实验中观察到的价格,但基于代理的模型结果中由于生产过剩导致的效率低得多。该结果表明,人类代理商能够通过社会规范找到解决方案,而此处所使用的基于代理商的简单规则则错过了这些解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号