首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Economic Inequality >Normative Measures of Tax Progressivity: an International Comparison
【24h】

Normative Measures of Tax Progressivity: an International Comparison

机译:规范性税收性措施:国际比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relevance of tax progressivity measures to policymaking depends on whether they help assess the extent to which taxation leads to social welfare gains or losses. The social welfare implications of progressivity measures have yet to be explored adequately in the literature. This paper helps to fill this gap by proposing a social welfare function framework to derive measures of tax progressivity and explore their normative properties. Using the social welfare framework, the paper derives the Kakwani index from Sen's social welfare function as well as a new class of progressivity measures that incorporate a distributional judgment parameter capturing inequality aversion. The paper also discusses the social welfare implications of the Suits measure of tax progressivity and develops a new measure of tax progressivity derived from the Bonferroni social welfare function. The paper derives both relative and absolute measures of tax progressivity from the social welfare function framework. The methodology developed in the paper is applied to make international comparisons of tax progressivity in 32 developed countries. The paper calculates the magnitude of welfare gains and losses due to taxation and the required social rates of return of public investments for governments to break even. This paper finds that the governments in some countries have to generate high social rates of return from their public investments to compensate for losses of social welfare from taxation. It concludes that optimizing social welfare requires designing a progressive tax system, minimizing the administrative costs of collecting taxes, and maximizing the social rates of return by efficiently investing tax revenues.
机译:税收进度措施与政策制定的相关性取决于他们是否有助于评估税收导致社会福利收益或损失的程度。进展措施的社会福利概念尚未在文献中充分探讨。本文有助于通过提出社会福利功能框架来填补税收进展措施,探索其规范性质的措施,有助于填补这一差距。使用社会福利框架,该论文源于森社会福利功能的Kakwani指数,以及一种新的渐进措施,该措施包括分配判断参数捕获不等式厌恶。本文还讨论了诉讼税收措施的社会福利对税收衡量,并制定了源于Bonferroni社会福利职能的新税收进度衡量标准。本文从社会福利职能框架中源于税收进度的相对和绝对措施。本文发展中开发的方法适用于在32个发达国家进行国际税收进度比较。本文计算税收造成的福利收益和损失的程度,以及公共投资返回所需的社会投资甚至休息所需的社会税率。本文认为,一些国家的政府必须从公共投资中产生高社会返回,以弥补税收的社会福利损失。它的结论是,优化社会福利需要设计进步税制,最大限度地减少收集税收的行政费用,并通过有效投资税收收入来最大限度地提高返回的社会税率。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号