首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Geography >Cultural political economy meets global production networks: a productive meeting?
【24h】

Cultural political economy meets global production networks: a productive meeting?

机译:文化政治经济学与全球生产网络相遇:富有成效的会议?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this article, I explore some of the implications of pursuing a cultural political economy (CPE) approach to the analysis of global production networks (GPNs). This raises three sets of issues: the current state of knowledge about GPNs; the current state of knowledge about CPE and the current state of relationships between analyses of GPNs and CPE. GPNs can be seen as encompassing the entirety of the circuit of production and to be constituted via a variety of flows (of capital in various forms such as commodities and money, knowledge and people) between a variety of nodes, sites and spaces (of production, exchange and consumption), with varying governance arrangements, both multi-scalar (supra-national, national, regional and urban) and non-scalar networked forms of governance. As these are Global Production Networks these nodes and the flows linking them are, by definition, distributed around the globe, albeit unevenly. CPE seeks to conjoin a more thorough treatment of the semiotic to more established concepts of political economy and there has been some considerable success in this regard [for example see Jessop and Sum (2006 Beyond the Regulation Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar)]. As yet, however, there has been little serious engagement with the materiality of the economy and so with the relations between the material, semiotic and political economic within CPE. A similar criticism can be made of work on GPNs. Integrating considerations of the materiality of the economy more systematically enriches a CPE perspective, while exploring common ground between CPE and GPN approaches enables these advantages to be translated into the latter and further enhance its conceptual reach.
机译:在本文中,我将探讨采用文化政治经济学(CPE)方法分析全球生产网络(GPN)的一些含义。这引起了三组问题:关于GPN的当前知识状态;有关CPE的当前知识状态以及GPN和CPE分析之间关系的当前状态。 GPN可以被视为涵盖了生产循环的整个过程,并通过(生产的)各个节点,场所和空间之间的各种流动(资本以商品,货币,知识和人等各种形式)构成,交易和消费),并采用不同的治理安排,包括多标量(超国家,国家,地区和城市)和非标量网络化治理形式。由于这些是全球生产网络,因此,按照定义,这些节点和连接它们的流程虽然分布不均,但分布在全球各地。 CPE试图将对符号学的更彻底的处理与更成熟的政治经济学概念结合起来,并且在这方面已经取得了相当大的成功(例如,参见Jessop和Sum(2006年,超越监管方法。切尔滕纳姆:爱德华·埃尔加)。)。但是,到目前为止,在CPE中,几乎没有认真地参与经济的实质性活动,也没有认真地参与过物质,符号学和政治经济学之间的关系。可以对GPN进行类似的批评。对经济重要性的综合考虑更加系统地丰富了CPE的观点,同时探索CPE和GPN方法之间的共同点使这些优势可以转化为后者,并进一步扩大其概念范围。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Economic Geography》 |2008年第3期|p.421-440|共20页
  • 作者

    Ray Hudson*;

  • 作者单位

    *Department of Geography, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, England. email:;

    Ray.Hudson{at}durham.ac.uk;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:20:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号