...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization >The Riksbank, emergency finance, policy experimentation, and Sweden's reversal of fortune
【24h】

The Riksbank, emergency finance, policy experimentation, and Sweden's reversal of fortune

机译:瑞典央行,紧急融资,政策试验和瑞典的财富逆转

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

At the beginning of the 18th century, Sweden was an imperial power that had just sustained a century of modest economic growth. In 1800, Sweden's empire was gone, after a series of military defeats. Real GDP per capita had fallen to the same level as the early 1600s. In other words, the 18th century witnessed the end of the Swedish Empire and a startling reversal of economic progress. In this paper, I propose a possible explanation for both of these outcomes. First, I argue that Sweden's limited fiscal capacity played an important role. The creation of the Riksbank should have facilitated government borrowing and military spending as the Bank of England did for the British. However, the Riksbank was not designed or equipped for this role. I document the constraints on financing national defense through the Riksbank and argue that the bank was ill-equipped to finance an adequate national defense. This explains the reversal of the empire. Second, when the Hats took power in the Riksdag in 1739, they used the Riksbank to give loans to firms, which were financed through the issuance of bank notes. The objective was to increase investment and economic activity. I find no evidence that these loans had any effect on real GDP per capita. However, the resulting inflation has a negative and significant effect on output during the period of inconvertible paper money. The combined evidence suggests that Hat policy contributed to the decline in economic activity during the reversal of fortune. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在18世纪初,瑞典是一个帝国,刚刚维持了一个世纪的温和经济增长。 1800年,在一系列军事失败之后,瑞典帝国消失了。实际人均国内生产总值已下降到与1600年代初期相同的水平。换句话说,十八世纪见证了瑞典帝国的终结和经济发展的惊人逆转。在本文中,我对这两种结果都提出了可能的解释。首先,我认为瑞典有限的财政能力发挥了重要作用。像瑞典央行为英国人所做的那样,成立瑞典央行本应便利政府借贷和军事开支。但是,Riksbank并非为此角色设计或配备的。我记录了通过瑞典央行为国防筹集资金的限制条件,并指出该银行没有足够的资金来筹集足够的国防资金。这解释了帝国的逆转。其次,当帽子于1739年在瑞典央行掌权时,他们利用瑞典央行向企业提供贷款,这些资金是通过发行钞票来筹集的。目的是增加投资和经济活动。我发现没有证据表明这些贷款对人均实际GDP有影响。但是,由此产生的通货膨胀在不可兑换纸币期间对产出产生负面影响和重大影响。综合证据表明,帽政策在财富逆转期间导致了经济活动的下降。 (C)2020 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号