首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Documentation >Privilege and public provision in the intellectual welfare state (Reprinted from Journal of Documentation, vol 12, pg 15-23, 1956)
【24h】

Privilege and public provision in the intellectual welfare state (Reprinted from Journal of Documentation, vol 12, pg 15-23, 1956)

机译:智力福利国家的特权和公共提供(转载自《文档杂志》,第12卷,第15-23页,1956年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper, originally published in 1956, is to examine the assumptions about people's needs for and rights to information which lie behind the establishment of privately and publicly owned libraries, to consider how far these assumptions are valid, and finally to discuss the proper part to be played by privately owned libraries in the national library service.Design/methodology/approach - Identifies and reflects on the assumptions in quotations from charters and terms of reference of a variety of libraries and from official statements about library provision.Findings - Publicly supported libraries should satisfy the demands of the general reader for everything that is in print, including foreign material, and in doing so should give greater consideration to the geographical and temporal convenience of the reader in the case of both reference and loan material; that all demands on the interlibrary loan system should be met where possible from the stock of publicly supported libraries: that special libraries should give priority to the demands of their special clients but that they should consider increasing services to outsiders on a fee basis.Originality/value - Suggests that it would be possible, when assessing the different categories of library, to have slightly varying criteria in mind and each librarian would be able to gauge the quality of his services by reference to explicit particular ends.
机译:目的-本文最初发表于1956年,目的是研究建立私有和公共图书馆背后的人们对信息的需求和知情权的假设,以考虑这些假设在多大程度上有效,最后讨论国家图书馆服务中私有图书馆应发挥的适当作用。设计/方法/方法-识别并反思各种图书馆的章程和职责范围以及官方提供的图书馆声明中引述的假设。调查结果-受公共支持的图书馆应满足普通读者对印刷品(包括外国资料)的需求,在使用参考资料和借阅资料的情况下,应更多地考虑读者的地理和时间便利性;应尽可能从公共支持的图书馆中满足对图书馆间借阅系统的所有要求:特殊图书馆应优先考虑其特殊客户的需求,但他们应考虑增加收费的对外人服务。价值-建议在评估图书馆的不同类别时,可能会考虑稍微不同的标准,并且每个图书馆员都可以通过参考明确的特定目的来评估其服务质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号