首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Short-Day Photoperiod Increases Milk Yield in Cows with a Reduced Dry Period Length
【24h】

Short-Day Photoperiod Increases Milk Yield in Cows with a Reduced Dry Period Length

机译:短期光周期可增加奶牛的产奶量,缩短干旱期长度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Exposure of cows to a short-day photoperiod (SDPP; 8 h light: 16 h dark) during a 60-d dry period increases milk yield in the subsequent lactation compared with cows exposed to a long-day photoperiod (LDPP; 16 h light:8 h dark). Whereas the traditional recommendation for dry period length is 60 d, recent studies indicate that the dry period length can be reduced without depressing the yield in the next lactation. However, the optimal duration of the dry period appears to be between 40 and 60 d, because fewer than 30 d could result in a significant loss of milk production. Our main objective was to determine whether treatment with SDPP combined with a reduced dry period length of 42 d would increase milk yield in the next lactation relative to treatment with LDPP, even though SDPP exposure was limited to 42 d. Multiparous Holstein cows (n = 40) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments during the dry period: LDPP or SDPP. Each treatment group (n = 20) was balanced according to the previous 305-d mature equivalent milk yield. To quantify plasma prolactin (PRL) concentration, blood samples were collected weekly during the dry period. Dry matter intake (DMI) was recorded during the dry period. Health was monitored weekly during the dry period and at calving. During lactation, milk yield and DMI were recorded for 120 and 42 d, respectively. Cows exposed to SDPP calved 4.8 d earlier than cows exposed to LDPP and days dry averaged 37 and 42 d for cows exposed to SDPP and LDPP, respectively. Cows on SDPP consumed more dry matter (17.0 ± 1.1 kg/d) during the dry period than did cows on LDPP (15.9 ± 1.1 kg/d), but DMI after parturition did not differ. In the first 42 d of lactation, cows exposed to SDPP and LDPP consumed 18.0 and 17.7 ± 1.4 kg/d, respectively. The periparturi-ent PRL surge was greater in cows exposed to LDPPrn(22.6 ± 3.2 ng/mL) than in those exposed to SDPP (17.1 ±4.1 ng/mL). Milk yield was inversely related to the magnitude of the periparturient PRL surge, but was directly related to the expression of PRL-receptor mRNA in lymphocytes during the dry period. Through 120 d of lactation, cows exposed to SDPP when dry produced more milk (40.4 ±1.1 kg/d) than cows exposed to LDPP (36.8 ± 1.1 kg/d). These results support the concept that SDPP, combined with a targeted 42-d dry period, increases milk yield in the subsequent lactation, relative to a 42-d dry period combined with LDPP, and that exposure to 42 d of SDPP in the dry period is sufficient to increase milk yield in the next lactation.
机译:与长期暴露于长期光照(LDPP; 16小时光照)的母牛相比,在干燥60天期间将母牛暴露于短期光照(SDPP; 8小时光照:16小时黑暗)可以提高随后泌乳期的产奶量。 :8小时黑暗)。传统的干旱期长度建议为60 d,最近的研究表明,可以减少干旱期长度,而不会降低下次泌乳的产量。但是,干燥期的最佳持续时间似乎在40至60 d之间,因为少于30 d可能会导致牛奶产量的显着下降。我们的主要目的是确定即使SDSD暴露时间限制为42 d,SDPP处理结合缩短的干燥期长度(42 d)在下一次哺乳期是否相对于LDPP处理会增加产奶量。在干旱期,将多头荷斯坦奶牛(n = 40)随机分配到2种处理之一中:LDPP或SDPP。每个处理组(n = 20)根据之前的305天成熟等效牛奶产量进行平衡。为了量化血浆催乳素(PRL)浓度,在干燥期间每周收集一次血液样本。在干燥期间记录干物质摄入量(DMI)。在干燥期间和产犊时每周进行一次健康监测。泌乳期间,分别记录了120天和42天的产奶量和DMI。暴露于SDPP的母牛比暴露于LDPP的母牛提前4.8 d产犊,而暴露于SDPP和LDPP的母牛的平均干燥天数分别为37 d和42 d。与低密度聚乙烯(LDPP)奶牛(15.9±1.1 kg / d)相比,SDPP奶牛在干燥期消耗更多的干物质(17.0±1.1 kg / d),但分娩后的DMI没有差异。在哺乳期的前42天,暴露于SDPP和LDPP的奶牛分别消耗18.0和17.7±1.4 kg / d。暴露于LDPPrn(22.6±3.2 ng / mL)的母牛的围产期PRL增高高于暴露于SDPP(17.1±4.1 ng / mL)的母牛。产奶量与围产期PRL激增的幅度成反比,但与干旱期间淋巴细胞PRL受体mRNA的表达直接相关。在哺乳期120 d中,干燥时暴露于SDPP的母牛比暴露于LDPP的母牛(36.8±1.1 kg / d)产生更多的牛奶(40.4±1.1 kg / d)。这些结果支持以下概念:SDPP结合有针对性的42天干燥期,相对于42 d干燥时期与LDPP结合,在随后的泌乳期增加了产奶量,并且在干燥期暴露于42 d SDPP足以在下一次哺乳期增加产奶量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号