首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, prepurchase considerations, and usefulness
【24h】

An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, prepurchase considerations, and usefulness

机译:对生产者精密奶牛养殖技术的使用,预购注意事项和有用性的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An online survey to identify producer precision dairy farming technology perception was distributed in March 2013 through web links sent to dairy producers through written publications and e-mail. Responses were collected in May 2013 and 109 surveys were used in statistical analysis. Producers were asked to select parameters monitored by technologies on their farm from a predetermined list and 68.8% of respondents indicated technology use on their dairies (31.2% of producers not using technologies). Daily milk yield (52.3%), cow activity (41.3%), and mastitis (25.7%) were selected most frequently. Producers were also asked to score the same list of parameters on usefulness using a 5-point scale (1 = not useful and 5 - useful). Producers indicated (mean ± SE) mastitis (4.77 ± 0.47), standing estrus (4.75 ± 0.55). and daily milk yield (4.72 ± 0.62) to be most useful. Producers were asked to score considerations taken before deciding to purchase a precision dairy farming technology from a predetermined list (1 = not important and 5 = important). Producers indicated benefit-to-cost ratio (4.57 ± 0.66), total investment cost (4.28 ± 0.83), and simplicity and ease of use (4.26 ± 0.75) to be most important when deciding whether to implement a technology. Producers were categorized based on technology use (using technology vs. not using technology) and differed significantly across technology usefulness scores, daily milk yield (using technologies: 4.83 ± 0.07 vs. not using technologies: 4.50 ± 0.10), and standing estrus (using technologies: 4.68 ± 0.06 vs. not using technologies: 4.91 ± 0.09). The same categories were used to evaluate technology use effect on prepurchase technology selection criteria and availability of local support (using technologies: 4.25 ±0.11 vs. not using technologies: 3.82 ± 0.16) differed significantly. Producer perception of technology remains relatively unknown to manufacturers. Using this data, technology manufacturers may better design and market technologies to producer need.
机译:2013年3月,通过书面出版物和电子邮件将网络链接发送给乳制品生产商,进行了在线调查,以查明生产者对乳品生产者的精确技术认识。 2013年5月收集了答复,并在统计分析中使用了109个调查。生产者被要求从预定列表中选择农场技术监控的参数,有68.8%的受访者表示奶场使用了技术(31.2%的生产者未使用技术)。最经常选择每日产奶量(52.3%),奶牛活动(41.3%)和乳腺炎(25.7%)。还要求生产者使用5分制来对相同的有用性参数列表进行评分(1 =无用,5-有用)。生产者表示(平均±SE)乳腺炎(4.77±0.47),发情站立(4.75±0.55)。最有效的每日牛奶产量(4.72±0.62)。在决定从预定列表中购买精密奶牛养殖技术之前,要求生产者对考虑的因素进行评分(1 =不重要,5 =重要)。生产者指出,在决定是否实施一项技术时,最重要的是成本效益比(4.57±0.66),总投资成本(4.28±0.83)和简单易用性(4.26±0.75)。生产者根据技术使用情况(使用技术或不使用技术)进行分类,并且在技术实用性评分,每日牛奶产量(使用技术:4.83±0.07与不使用技术:4.50±0.10)和站立发情(使用技术:4.68±0.06与未使用技术:4.91±0.09)。相同类别用于评估技术使用对预购技术选择标准的影响以及本地支持的可用性(使用技术:4.25±0.11与未使用技术:3.82±0.16)存在显着差异。生产者对技术的感知对于制造商仍然相对未知。利用这些数据,技术制造商可以更好地设计和销售技术以满足生产商的需求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2015年第6期|4198-4205|共8页
  • 作者

    M. R. Borchers; J. M. Bewley;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546;

    Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    producer perception; survey; parameter; precision dairy farming technology;

    机译:生产者感知;调查;参数;精密奶牛养殖技术;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:23:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号