首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >The effect of concentrate feeding amount and feeding strategy on milk production, dry matter intake, and energy partitioning of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows
【24h】

The effect of concentrate feeding amount and feeding strategy on milk production, dry matter intake, and energy partitioning of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows

机译:浓缩饲喂量和饲喂策略对秋季产犊荷斯坦-弗里斯兰奶牛的产奶量,干物质摄入量和能量分配的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare the milk production, dry matter intake, and energy partitioning of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows offered a high or low amount of concentrate using 1 of 2 feeding strategies. One hundred and eight autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows were blocked based on milk production data from wk 3 and 4 of lactation, and were divided into low-, medium-, and high-milk yield subgroups. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments (n = 27) in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Treatment factors were concentrate feeding amount, high concentrate = 7.0 (Hi) or low concentrate = 4.0 kg of DM/cow per day (Lo), and concentrate feeding strategy, flat rate (FR) or group-fed to yield (GFY). In the GFY treatments, cows were allocated concentrate based on their milk yield in the third and fourth weeks of lactation. The lowest-yielding cows (n = 9) received 5.3 and 2.3 kg of DM of concentrate on the Hi and Lo treatments respectively, the highest-yielding cows (n = 9) received 8.7 and 5.7 kg of DM of concentrate on the Hi and Lo treatments respectively, and the average yield cows received the same amount of concentrate as the corresponding FR group (i.e., 7.0 and 4.0 kg of DM of concentrate on the Hi and Lo treatments, respectively). The proportion of forage in the diet was 63% of total dry matter intake (TDMI) for the Hi treatment and 75% of TDMI for the Lo treatment. No significant interaction was noted between concentrate feeding amount and concentrate feeding strategy for dry matter intake or milk yield. Cows on the Hi treatment had a higher TDMI (18.7 ± 0.36 kg/cow per day) compared with cows on the Lo treatment (15.8 ± 0.36 kg/cow per day). The milk yield of cows offered the Hi treatment was 1.3 kg/cow per day higher than the milk yield of cows on the Lo treatment (23.8 ± 0.31 kg/cow per day). Milk solids yield was 0.10 kg/cow per day higher on the Hi treatment than on the Lo treatment (1.83 ± 0.03 kg of DM/cow per day). Cows on the Hi treatment had an estimated net energy demand of 18.0 ± 0.38 UFL (unite fourragere lait)/cow per day and a net energy intake of 17.6 ± 0.33 UFL/ cow per day during the experimental period. Cows on the Lo treatment had an energy demand of 16.8 ± 0.38 UFL/cow per day and an energy intake of 14.9 ± 0.33 UFL/cow per day. No significant difference in TDMI, milk yield, milk solids yield, or energy balance was observed between the FR and GFY treatments. By increasing the total amount of concentrate offered, cows had higher TDMI and energy intake, which resulted in increased milk production and reduced negative energy balance and body condition score loss.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用两种喂养策略中的一种,比较秋天产犊的荷斯坦-弗里斯兰奶牛的产奶量,干物质摄入量和能量分配情况。根据第3周和第4周泌乳期的产奶量数据,对118头秋季产犊的荷斯坦-弗里斯兰奶牛进行了封锁,并将其分为低,中和高产牛奶亚组。在2×2因子设计中,将母牛随机分配到4种治疗方法中的1种(n = 27)。处理因素为精矿饲喂量,高精矿= 7.0(Hi)或低精矿= 4.0 kg DM /牛每天/ Lo(Lo),以及精矿饲喂策略,统一费率(FR)或成群饲喂产量(GFY)。在GFY处理中,根据泌乳期第三和第四周的产奶量向母牛分配浓缩液。产量最低的母牛(n = 9)分别在Hi和Lo处理中接受5.3和2.3公斤DM浓缩物,产量最高的母牛(n = 9)在Hi和Lo处理中分别接受8.7和5.7 kg DM浓缩物。 Lo处理分别和平均产量的母牛接受与相应FR组相同数量的精矿(即在Hi和Lo处理中分别为7.0和4.0 kg DM精矿)。日粮中饲草的比例为Hi处理的总干物质摄入量(TDMI)的63%,Lo处理的为总干物质摄入量的75%。对于干物质摄入量或产奶量,浓缩物进料量与浓缩物进料策略之间没有显着的相互作用。与采用Lo处理的母牛(每天15.8±0.36千克/牛)相比,采用Hi处理的母牛具有更高的TDMI(每天18.7±0.36千克/牛)。提供Hi处理的母牛的产奶量比Lo处理的母牛的产奶量(每天23.8±0.31 kg /牛)高1.3 kg /头/天。 Hi处理的牛奶固体产量比Lo处理的牛奶固体产量每天高0.10 kg /牛(每天DM /牛的1.83±0.03 kg DM)。在实验期间,采用Hi疗法的奶牛每天的净能量需求估计为18.0±0.38 UFL /每头牛,每天的净能量摄入为17.6±0.33 UFL /母牛。接受Lo处理的母牛每天的能量需求为16.8±0.38 UFL /牛,每天的能量摄入为14.9±0.33 UFL /牛。 FR和GFY处理之间的TDMI,牛奶产量,牛奶固体产量或能量平衡没有显着差异。通过增加精料总量,奶牛的TDMI和能量摄入量更高,从而导致牛奶产量增加,负能量平衡减少和身体状况评分下降。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2015年第1期|338-348|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland,School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland;

    Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland;

    School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland;

    Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland;

    Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    variable feeding; concentrate; feed to yield; energy balance;

    机译:可变喂食;浓缩;饲料产量能量平衡;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:23:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号