首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >FGM/Cutting: Contextualising Recent Legal Developments
【24h】

FGM/Cutting: Contextualising Recent Legal Developments

机译:切割女性生殖器官/切割:根据最新法律发展情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper seeks to present issues relating to female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM) in a manner which is more socio-legal than is usual in this journal, partly because, while there is an important new statute, the Serious Crimes Act 2015, the accepted view of FGM across the world (e.g. mention is made below of Egypt) is that criminal law alone is most unlikely to prevent or deter FGM; this approach is very much that recently adopted in England and Wales and indeed in the other countries within the UK. Changing criminal law affecting women and girls at risk of FGM in the UK is, moreover, of little use if 'vacation cutting' (see below) takes place. Non-coercive means within a comprehensive strategy, including cross-agency action and utilising NGOs, seem in this arena to be more successful than coercive ones. Criminal law is dealt in this article within this socio-legal context and not in a freestanding manner as is usual.
机译:本文力图以一种比本期刊更常见的社会法律方式提出与女性生殖器切割/切割(FGM)有关的问题,部分原因是,尽管有一项重要的新法规《 2015年严重犯罪法》,全世界对女性外阴残割的普遍看法(例如下面提到的埃及)是,仅刑法是最不可能阻止或阻止女性外阴残割的;这种方法与英格兰和威尔士以及英国其他国家最近采用的方法非常相似。此外,如果发生“休假削减”(见下文),改变影响到有女性生殖器切割风险的妇女和女童的刑法几乎没有用处。全面战略中的非强制性手段,包括跨机构行动和利用非政府组织,在这个领域似乎比强制性手段更为成功。本文在这种社会法律背景下处理刑法,而不是像往常一样以独立的方式处理刑法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号