首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >Exorcism, Religious Freedom and Consent: The Devil in the Detail
【24h】

Exorcism, Religious Freedom and Consent: The Devil in the Detail

机译:驱魔,宗教自由和同意:细节中的魔鬼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The ruling in R v Brown that consent could not be a defence to actual bodily harm or more serious injury unless a recognised exemption applied has been much criticised. When considered exclusively in light of adult sexual activity, such criticisms may appear extremely persuasive. However, the issue of assault within exorcism reveals that there are other contexts in which the arguments appear more complex. This article examines the criminal law relating to consent and exorcism and asks how we should deal with the interplay between the general and the specific when it comes to formulating legal policy.
机译:R v Brown案中的裁决,除非受到公认的豁免,否则同意不能为实际的人身伤害或更严重的伤害辩护。如果仅根据成人的性行为来考虑,这种批评可能会极具说服力。但是,驱魔内的攻击问题表明,在其他情况下,论点似乎更为复杂。本文研究了与同意和驱魔有关的刑法,并提出了在制定法律政策时,我们应如何处理一般性与特殊性之间的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号