首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >Legal Consequences of Animal Hoarding in New Zealand
【24h】

Legal Consequences of Animal Hoarding in New Zealand

机译:新西兰动物Ho积的法律后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A 10-year prohibition against a defendant from owning or exercising authority over any animals has been upheld by the New Zealand Court of Appeal in an animal hoarding case which has progressed through the New Zealand legal system over the past 5 years. This comment reviews the Court of Appeal decision (Kondratyeva v R CA6/2015 2015] NZCA 266 [23 June 2015]) and explores the increasing evidence of a mental health component in animal hoarding behaviour. It also discusses the stress and burden that animal hoarding cases places on the shelters that have the legal responsibility for prosecuting animal cruelty cases in New Zealand.
机译:新西兰上诉法院在过去五年中通过新西兰法律制度审理的动物ho积案中维持了十年禁止被告拥有或行使对任何动物的权力的禁令。该评论审查了上诉法院的裁决(Kondratyeva诉R CA6 / 2015 2015] NZCA 266 [2015年6月23日]),并探讨了动物ho积行为中心理健康因素的越来越多的证据。它还讨论了动物ard积案件给庇护所带来的压力和负担,这些庇护所应承担起诉新西兰虐待动物案件的法律责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号