首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >Supreme Court and Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Secondary Participation in Crime R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7
【24h】

Supreme Court and Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Secondary Participation in Crime R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7

机译:最高法院和枢密院司法委员会刑事犯罪中的第二参与R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In these unconnected conjoined appeals both appellants had been convicted of murder after trial, their juries having been directed on the basis of what was widely accepted to be the law of joint enterprise. Each had been present when a principal offender killed their respective victims, and each appellant had, on the findings of their juries, given assistance or encouragement to those principals. The trial judge for each had, as was to be expected at the time, directed the juries in a manner consistent with the Privy Council authority of Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] AC 168.
机译:在这些无关联的联合上诉中,两个上诉人均在审判后被裁定犯有谋杀罪,其陪审团根据公认的共同企业法作出判决。当一个主要罪犯杀死他们各自的受害者时,每个人都在场,每个上诉人根据其陪审团的裁定,对那些主要人给予了帮助或鼓励。正如当时所预期的那样,每个审判法官的裁决方式均与枢密院对Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] AC 168的授权一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号