...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >Civil Society and Gender Justice. Historical and Comparative Perspectives
【24h】

Civil Society and Gender Justice. Historical and Comparative Perspectives

机译:民间社会与性别公正。历史和比较观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The civil society paradox concerning the discrepancy between the ideal notion of a civil society promoting inclusion, participation and equality, and a 'lived' or 'experienced' civil society which, repeatedly over the course of history, demonstrates exclusionary practices, is at the core of this highly engaging and sometimes provocative volume which addresses the paradox in both historical and contemporary (mostly) European contexts. Taking gender justice in civil society seriously requires, the volume demonstrates, a thorough rethinking of the notion of 'civil society' which hitherto has been theorised and investigated in non-gendered ways by more mainstream scholars (Hagemann, p. 19).
机译:民间社会悖论涉及促进包容,参与和平等的民间社会的理想观念与“活的”或“有经验的”民间社会之间的差异,这种观念在历史的过程中反复表明排斥行为是核心这本引人入胜的,有时甚至是挑衅性的著作中,其中一部论述了历史和当代(主要是)欧洲背景下的悖论。该书证明,认真对待公民社会中的性别正义,需要对“公民社会”的概念进行彻底的重新思考,迄今为止,“主流社会”已被更多主流学者以非性别的方式进行了理论和研究(Hagemann,第19页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号