...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >'And People's Concerns Were Genuine: Why Didn't We Listen More?': Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Recognition in Europe
【24h】

'And People's Concerns Were Genuine: Why Didn't We Listen More?': Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Recognition in Europe

机译:“而且人们的担忧是真实的:我们为什么不多听?”:欧洲的民族主义,多元文化主义和认可

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this article is to draw attention to the dangerous, indeed poisonous, nature of the current debates on immigration and multiculturalism in today's 'omniphobic' Europe, plagued not only by a severe economic crisis, but also a more general normative crisis, a 'crisis of values' so to speak, which has been consistently overlooked or manipulated by politicians and academics alike, or reduced to an epiphenomenon bound to disappear when financial balances are restored. I will argue in this context that nationalism (in some cases even outright racism) is key to understanding this crisis, a catalyst acting either as a cause or a symptom, and almost always as a profound source of legitimacy. Following a brief critique of the literature on the purported 'death' of multiculturalism-the academic side of the same coin-the article concludes by sketching the normative contours of an alternative model of multiculturalism, one that stresses the importance of the ideas of recognition, redistribution and participation.
机译:本文的目的是提请人们注意当前在当今的“恐高症”欧洲中有关移民和多元文化主义的辩论的危险性,的确是有毒的,这不仅受到严重的经济危机的困扰,而且还受到更为普遍的规范性危机的困扰。可以说,“价值危机”一直被政客和学者所忽视或操纵,或者被归结为在恢复财政平衡时必定消失的现象。在这种情况下,我将论证说,民族主义(在某些情况下甚至是彻底的种族主义)是理解这场危机的关键,它是原因或症状的催化剂,并且几乎始终是合法性的深刻来源。在对所谓的多元文化主义的“死亡”一词进行了简短的批评之后(同一枚硬币的学术方面),本文以素描多元文化主义另一种模式的规范轮廓作为结尾,其中强调了承认思想的重要性,重新分配和参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号