首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consumer research >Head versus Heart: The Effect of Objective versus Feelings-Based Mental Imagery on New Product Creativity
【24h】

Head versus Heart: The Effect of Objective versus Feelings-Based Mental Imagery on New Product Creativity

机译:头部与心脏:基于客观与基于情感的心理意象对新产品创意的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Imagination visual mental imagery, a mental simulation process that involves imagining an end user interacting with an end product, has been proposed as an efficient strategy to incorporate end-user experiences during new product ideation. Consumer research finds that this strategy enhances overall product usefulness, but does not resolve whether and how this process may impact outcome originality. The present work delineates the imagination visual mental imagery construct and argues that such mental imagery can take two different routes-one that is more feelings-based (i.e., feelings-imagination), and one that is more objective (i.e., objective-imagination). Further, we propose that although these two approaches will equally benefit outcome usefulness, they will have differential impact on outcome originality. Across five studies, we demonstrate that adopting a feelings-imagination versus an objective-imagination approach induces higher empathic concern, enhancing cognitive flexibility, which leads to higher outcome originality. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
机译:想象视觉视觉影像是一种心理模拟过程,涉及想象最终用户与最终​​产品进行交互,已被视为一种有效的策略,可以在新产品构想过程中纳入最终用户的体验。消费者研究发现,该策略可增强整体产品的实用性,但无法解决此过程是否以及如何影响结果的独创性。本工作描述了想象力视觉心理意象的构造,并认为这种心理意象可以采取两种不同的途径:一种是基于情感的(即情感-想象),而另一种是更为客观的(即客观-想象)。 。此外,我们建议,尽管这两种方法将同样有益于结果的实用性,但它们将对结果的原创性产生不同的影响。在五项研究中,我们证明采用感觉-想象而非客观-想象方法会引起更高的共情关注度,增强认知灵活性,从而导致更高的结果原创性。理论和管理意义进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号