...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consumer policy >Costs and Benefits of Recycling Liquid Board Containers
【24h】

Costs and Benefits of Recycling Liquid Board Containers

机译:回收液体纸板容器的成本和收益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recycling of packaging material has become more or less mandatory in many European countries, including Norway. Through so-called voluntary agreements quantitative targets are set for the proportion of total waste to be recycled. At the same time the strategic objective for Norwegian waste policy is that there should be a socio-economic balance between different waste treatment options. On the basis of a cost-benefit analysis it is questioned whether the Norwegian recycling policy for liquid board containers really is cost-effective. The calculations show that the net social costs of the recycling system in 1999 amounted to EDU3.5 million. The high cost is due to the fact that these containers constitute a small fraction of total waste from the household and that it is costly to separate it from other waste. The environmental costs from landfilling or incineration are small compared to the costs of recycling. The best alternative, according to our analysis, is to incinerate the containers with energy recovery.
机译:在包括挪威在内的许多欧洲国家,包装材料的回收已变得越来越强制。通过所谓的自愿协议,为要回收的总废物比例设定了量化目标。同时,挪威废物政策的战略目标是,不同废物处理方案之间应在社会经济上取得平衡。在成本效益分析的基础上,人们质疑挪威的液体板容器回收政策是否确实具有成本效益。计算表明,1999年回收系统的净社会成本为350万埃德里亚尔。成本高是因为这些容器只占家庭总废物的一小部分,并且将其与其他废物分开是很昂贵的。与回收相比,填埋或焚化产生的环境成本很小。根据我们的分析,最好的选择是通过能量回收来焚化容器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号