首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Consumer Marketing >Can a brand outperform competitors on cross-category loyalty? An examination of cross-selling metrics in two financial services markets
【24h】

Can a brand outperform competitors on cross-category loyalty? An examination of cross-selling metrics in two financial services markets

机译:品牌能否在跨类别忠诚度方面超越竞争对手?考察两个金融服务市场的交叉销售指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Many service organisations seek to grow by selling additional different products to their existing customers. Many managers are evaluated on the level of customer loyalty in terms of cross-product holdings - for example, the average number of bank products or insurance policies held per customer. The purpose of this paper is to provide managers and researchers with some contextual knowledge and norms concerning "cross-category" loyalty. Design/methodology/approach - In order to compare the levels of loyalty for competing brands, five relevant loyalty metrics were used in the analysis, with data sourced from two service industries, banking and insurance. Findings - The results show little variation in loyalty scores between competing brands, and what variation there is can be explained by historic factors, without reference to CRM strategies. This suggests that investments into CRM and cross-selling initiatives seem to have less effect on loyalty metrics than many marketing textbooks and CRM advocates have assumed. Practical implications - Marketers should be very cautious of setting ambitious goals for increasing loyalty to their brand at a cross-category level. Originality/value - Very few research papers have explored the issue of cross-category loyalty. This is despite the value of the specific loyalty metrics as key performance indicators in service industries such as financial services and insurance.
机译:目的-许多服务组织通过向其现有客户销售其他不同产品来寻求增长。许多经理根据跨产品持有量对客户忠诚度水平进行评估,例如,每位客户持有的银行产品或保险单的平均数量。本文的目的是为管理人员和研究人员提供有关“跨类别”忠诚度的一些上下文知识和规范。设计/方法/方法-为了比较竞争品牌的忠诚度水平,在分析中使用了五个相关的忠诚度指标,数据来自银行和保险业两个服务行业。调查结果-结果显示,各竞争品牌之间的忠诚度得分差异不大,而且这种差异可以由历史因素来解释,而无需参考CRM策略。这表明,与许多营销教科书和CRM倡导者所假设的那样,对CRM和交叉销售计划的投资似乎对忠诚度指标的影响较小。实际意义-营销人员应谨慎设定宏伟的目标,以在跨类别的层次上提高对其品牌的忠诚度。创意/价值-很少有研究论文探讨跨类别忠诚度的问题。尽管将特定忠诚度指标作为服务行业(例如金融服务和保险)的关键绩效指标具有价值,但仍需要这样做。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号