...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management >Asset Management Perspective on the Duration of Public-Private Partnership Contracts: Cost-Control Trade-off?
【24h】

Asset Management Perspective on the Duration of Public-Private Partnership Contracts: Cost-Control Trade-off?

机译:资产管理对公私合营合同期限的看法:成本控制权衡?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The risk-incentive model of principal-agent relations and its extensions to infrastructural public-private partnerships outline the efficiency implications of parameters such as contract duration. The predominant focus on individual contracts is of limited use for public agencies that need to allocate their resources efficiently at the level of the entire asset network. This study therefore adopts an asset management perspective on the issue of contract duration in public-private partnership (PPP) contracts. In so doing, this research aims to add to the understanding of asset network level effects of important contractual parameters such as contract duration. Empirical material from the Netherlands illustrates that public professionals tend to think about contract duration in terms of a network cost-network control trade-off. From the data, a hierarchical set of criteria deemed relevant for determination of contract duration is elaborated that ultimately supports network accessibility. Limitations, managerial implications, and suggestions for future research are discussed.
机译:委托代理关系的风险激励模型及其对基础设施公私伙伴关系的扩展概述了合同期限等参数对效率的影响。对于需要在整个资产网络层次上有效分配资源的公共机构,主要关注单个合同的用途有限。因此,本研究对公私合营(PPP)合同的合同期限问题采用了资产管理的观点。通过这样做,本研究旨在增加对重要合同参数(例如合同期限)的资产网络水平影响的理解。荷兰的经验材料表明,公共专业人员倾向于从网络成本-网络控制权衡的角度来考虑合同期限。从数据中,详细阐述了一套与确定合同期限有关的标准,最终支持了网络的可访问性。讨论了局限性,管理意义和对未来研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号