首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conflict and Security Law >Drugs as Weapons: Disarmament Treaties Facing the Advances in Biochemistry and Non-Lethal Weapons Technology
【24h】

Drugs as Weapons: Disarmament Treaties Facing the Advances in Biochemistry and Non-Lethal Weapons Technology

机译:毒品作为武器:面临生物化学和非致命武器技术进步的裁军条约

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The contemporary growing investment in non-lethal weapons technology and the rapid advance in science and technology pose significant challenges to the object and purpose of the disarmament system based on the conventions on chemical and biological weapons. The paper discusses whether the present revolution in the life sciences might lead States to skirt the so-called General Purpose Criterion included in both the conventions, which assures a comprehensive approach towards biochemical disarmament. The issue of the use of riot control agents and incapacitants arises in this context. It is important to stress that they belong to different classes of agents: while the former are designed to produce local sensory irritant effects, the latter target the human nervous system and other physiological systems. The paper finally addresses the complex problem of the non-prohibited purposes under the CWC, by dealing with the following two questions: whether it is permissible to use riot control agents in a time of armed conflict and whether other chemical agents, apart from riot control agents, can be lawfully used for law enforcement. The analysis conducted here confirms the continuing relevance of legal interpretation in solving the ambiguities of the current non-proliferation debate: the conclusion is that incapacitating agents do not satisfy the qualitative and quantitative requirements for the purpose of ‘law enforcement’.
机译:当代对非致命武器技术的投资不断增加以及科学技术的飞速发展,对基于化学和生物武器公约的裁军系统的目标和宗旨构成了重大挑战。该文件讨论了生命科学的当前革命是否可能导致各国跳过这两项公约中所包含的所谓“通用标准”,从而确保对生化裁军采取全面的方法。在这种情况下出现了使用防暴剂和失能者的问题。需要强调的是,它们属于不同类别的媒介:前者被设计为产生局部感觉刺激作用,而后者针对人类的神经系统和其他生理系统。本文最后通过解决以下两个问题,解决了《化学武器公约》规定的禁止用途的复杂问题:在武装冲突期间是否允许使用防暴剂以及除防暴之外是否还使用其他化学制剂代理商,可以合法地用于执法。此处进行的分析证实了法律解释在解决当前不扩散辩论中的含糊不清的意义:结论是,行为不端的人不满足“执法”目的的定性和定量要求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Conflict and Security Law》 |2010年第1期|p.5-24|共20页
  • 作者

    Mirko Sossai*;

  • 作者单位

    *Lecturer in international law, University of Rome TRE, Italy. All website addresses cited were active on 30 September 2009, unless otherwise specified.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号