首页> 外文期刊>Journal of comparative economics >Does a 'non-committed' government always generate lower social welfare than its 'committed' counterpart? Strategic trade policy when consumer surplus matters
【24h】

Does a 'non-committed' government always generate lower social welfare than its 'committed' counterpart? Strategic trade policy when consumer surplus matters

机译:“不承诺”的政府会始终产生比其“承诺”的政府更低的社会福利吗?当消费者剩余很重要时的战略贸易政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We show that social welfare in the setup where the government lacks the full ability to commit to its trade policies may exceed the social welfare when the government possesses full commitment power if consumer surplus is part of the social welfare function. This is never the case in the standard, "third market" framework of strategic trade policy. We provide two examples in which consumer surplus matters: the "home market" and the "intra-industry trade" setup. The policy instruments under consideration are import tariffs and export subsidies and there are R&D spillovers from the domestic to the foreign firm. Journal of Comparative Economics 39 (4) (2011) 533-556. CERGE-E1 Politickych veznu 7,11121 Prague 1, Czech Republic.
机译:我们表明,如果消费者剩余是社会福利职能的一部分,那么在政府缺乏完全承诺其贸易政策能力的环境中,如果政府拥有完全的承诺权,那么社会福利可能会超过社会福利。在战略贸易政策的标准“第三市场”框架中从来没有这种情况。我们提供两个有关消费者剩余问题的示例:“本国市场”和“行业内贸易”设置。正在考虑的政策工具是进口关税和出口补贴,并且有从国内企业到国外企业的研发溢出。比较经济学杂志39(4)(2011)533-556。 CERGE-E1 Politickych veznu 7,11121捷克共和国布拉格1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号