首页> 外文期刊>Journal of communication >Specificity, Conflict, and Focal Point: A Systematic Investigation into Social Media Censorship in China
【24h】

Specificity, Conflict, and Focal Point: A Systematic Investigation into Social Media Censorship in China

机译:特异性,冲突和焦点:对中国社会媒体审查的系统调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Internet censorship mechanisms in China are highly dynamic and yet to be fully accounted for by existing theories. This study interrogates postpublication censorship on Chinese social media by examining the differences between 2,280 pairs of censored WeChat articles and matched remaining articles. With the effects of account attributes and article topics excluded, we find that article specificity raises the odds of being censored. Also, an examination on a collection of international trade articles indicates that such articles with textual units disclosing conflicts, even pro-regime messages, are also removed by the censors. This mixed-method study introduces focal point as a theoretical angle to understand China's contextually contingent content regulation system and offers evidence based on large-scale, nonproprietary, and original social media data to investigate the evolving censorship mechanisms in China.
机译:中国的互联网审查机制是高度动态的,尚未得到现有理论的完全占据。本研究通过检查2,280对被审查的微博文章和剩余物品的差异来询问中国社交媒体的邮政审查。随着账户属性和文章主题的影响,我们发现文章特性提高了被审查的几率。此外,对国际贸易一系列的审查表明,裁查员也删除了披露冲突的文本单位的这些条款,甚至可以通过审查员删除。这种混合方法研究将焦点视为理论角度,以了解中国的上下文偶然的内容监管系统,并以大规模,非专业和原始社交媒体数据提供证据,以调查中国的不断发展的审查机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号