首页> 外文期刊>Journal of communication inquiry >Solidarity, Media, and the Limits of Postcapitalist Theory
【24h】

Solidarity, Media, and the Limits of Postcapitalist Theory

机译:团结,媒体和后资本主义理论的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay critically examines the postcapitalist characteristics of civil sphere theory (CST) and their implications for locating media in large-scale processes of social change. Providing a case study of U.S. media between the 1930s and 1980s, the essay argues that because CST treats media as free-floating images, rather than cultural industries and consumer practices, it is unable to account for a wide range of episodes in the making and unmaking of solidarity, including the Depression era's specter of social unraveling, the suburban dismantling of the industrial city's public amusement culture, and the emergence of a post-1960s New Right lens on media. The essay suggests that CST's approach to solidarity should be modified to account for media's deep embeddedness in the culture of capitalism. This would include recognizing that popular visions of community take shape within, and in response to, an economic culture uniquely prone to change. It would also include recognizing that messages and moments of solidarity are always experienced within built environments shaped by capital flows.
机译:本文批判性地考察了资本领域理论(CST)的后资本主义特征及其在大规模社会变革过程中对媒体定位的影响。这篇文章提供了1930年代至1980年代美国媒体的案例研究,认为由于CST将媒体视为自由浮动的图像,而不是文化产业和消费者习惯,因此它无法解释制作和制作过程中的广泛事件团结的失败,包括大萧条时代社会崩溃的幽灵,郊区拆除工业城市的公共娱乐文化,以及媒体出现了1960年代后的新右派镜头。文章建议,应修改CST的团结方式,以解决媒体在资本主义文化中的深层根植。这将包括认识到,流行的社区构想是在独特的易于改变的经济文化中形成的,并对此做出回应。它还将包括认识到,在由资本流动塑造的建筑环境中,总是经历着团结的信息和时刻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号