首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Commodity Markets >Monopolistic supply management in world metals markets: How large was Mount Isa?
【24h】

Monopolistic supply management in world metals markets: How large was Mount Isa?

机译:世界金属市场上的垄断供应管理:伊萨山有多大?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Standard arguments suggest that mining companies lack sufficient market share to allow profitable exercise of monopoly power. However, low production and consumption elasticities can lead to prices being very sensitive to small supply disruptions. Metals are durable commodities. Supply from stock can offset the impacts of low elasticities in the short run but stocks also prolong the impact of any supply restriction. The interaction between storage and low elasticities can confer pricing power on a producer with a modest market share. I illustrate by looking at Glencore's "disciplined" supply response when, in October 2015, the company announced a 30% cutback in zinc production. The zinc price more than doubled over the two subsequent years.
机译:标准论点表明,矿业公司缺乏足够的市场份额,以允许垄断权盈利行使。然而,低生产和消费弹性可能导致价格对小额供应中断非常敏感。金属是耐用的商品。股票供应可以抵消短期内弹性的影响,但股票也延长了任何供应限制的影响。储存和低弹性之间的相互作用可以在具有适度市场份额的制片人上授予定价电力。我通过观察Glencore的“纪律”供应响应,在2015年10月,该公司在锌生产中宣布了30%的削减。锌价格在随后的两年里翻了一番。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号