首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience >Distinct Neural Correlates for Resolving Stroop Conflict at Inhibited and Noninhibited Locations in Inhibition of Return
【24h】

Distinct Neural Correlates for Resolving Stroop Conflict at Inhibited and Noninhibited Locations in Inhibition of Return

机译:不同的神经相关性用于解决抑制返回中禁止和非禁止位置的Stroop冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is well documented that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) are intensively involved in conflict control. However, it remains unclear how these "executive" brain regions will act when the conflict control process interacts with spatial attentional orienting. In the classical spatial cueing paradigm [Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum], response to a target is delayed when it appears at the cued location compared with at the uncued location, if the time interval between the cue and the target is greater than 300 msec. This effect of inhibition of return (IOR) can alter the resolution of Stroop conflict such that the Stroop interference effect disappears at the cued (inhibited) location [Vivas, A. B., & Fuentes, L. J. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 315-323, 2001]. In this event-related functional magnetic resonance study, we investigate the differential neural mechanisms underlying interactions between pre- response interference, response interference, and spatial orienting. Two types of Stroop words [incongruent response-eligible words (IE), incongruent response-ineligible words (Ⅱ)] and neutral words were presented either at the cued or uncued location. The significant pre-response interference at the uncued location activated the left rostral ACC as compared with at the cued location. Moreover, although the IE words which have conflicts at both pre-response and response levels did not cause significant behavioral interference at the cued location, they activated the left DLPFC as compared with at the uncued location. Furthermore, neutral words showed significant IOR effects behaviorally, and they activated the left frontal eye field (FEF) at the uncued location relative to the cued location. These results suggest that the left rostral ACC is involved in the interaction between pre-response conflict and IOR, whereas the left DLPFC is involved in the interaction between response conflict and IOR. Moreover, the FEF is involved in shifting attentional focus to novel locations during spatial search.
机译:众所周知,前扣带回皮层(ACC)和背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)与冲突控制密切相关。但是,尚不清楚当冲突控制过程与空间注意力定向相互作用时,这些“执行性”大脑区域将如何起作用。在经典的空间提示范式中[Posner,M. I.,&Cohen,Y.(1984)。视觉定向的组成部分。在H. Bouma和D. G. Bouwhuis(编辑)中,注意力和表现X(第531-556页)。如果提示与目标之间的时间间隔大于300毫秒,则当目标出现在提示位置时,与未提示位置相比,对目标的响应会延迟。抑制返回(IOR)的效果可以更改Stroop冲突的解决方案,以使Stroop干扰效果在提示(受抑制)位置消失[Vivas,A. B.,&Fuentes,L. J. Stroop干扰会影响抑制返回。 《心理通报与评论》,第8卷,第315-323页,2001年]。在这项与事件相关的功能磁共振研究中,我们研究了预响应干扰,响应干扰和空间定向之间相互作用背后的差分神经机制。在提示或未提示的位置分别显示两种类型的Stroop单词[不合格的反应合格单词(IE),不合格的反应合格单词(Ⅱ)]和中性单词。与提示位置相比,未提示位置处的显着的响应前干扰激活了左侧延髓ACC。此外,尽管在预响应和响应级别上都具有冲突的IE单词在提示位置上不会引起明显的行为干扰,但与未提示位置相比,它们激活了左DLPFC。此外,中性词在行为上表现出显着的IOR效果,并且它们在相对于提示位置的未提示位置处激活了左额叶视场(FEF)。这些结果表明左前额叶ACC参与了反应前冲突和IOR之间的相互作用,而左DLPFC参与了反应冲突和IOR之间的相互作用。此外,FEF涉及在空间搜索过程中将注意力转移到新颖的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号