首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >LCA of spent fluorescent lamps in Thailand at various rates of recycling
【24h】

LCA of spent fluorescent lamps in Thailand at various rates of recycling

机译:泰国不同回收率的废荧光灯的LCA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents environmental impact of a fluorescent lamp (a long straight tube 36 watts, 200 g and 13,600 h for mean time before failure) when considering different disposal methods (recycle and non-recycle) of its spent fluorescent lamp (SFL). The study was applied for the case in Thailand using life cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool. All materials, energy use, and pollutant emissions to the environment from each related process were identified and analyzed. Impact assessment was conducted for 10 environmental impact potentials: carcinogens, respiratory organics, respiratory inorganics, climate change, radiation, ozone layer, ecotoxicity, acidification/eutrophication, land use and minerals. The analysis followed Eco-Indicator 99 method, individualist version 2.1. The main focus of the study was to compare the impact of SFL recycling with non-recycling before landfilling. The impact intermittent activities, production of raw material and energy used in all the concerned processes were taken into account. However, transportation activities were excluded. The results showed that for all recycling rates, cement production is the main contributor to the environmental impacts, while sodium sulfide production is second and electrical production, the third. Mercury vapor emission showed a small contribution in carcinogens and ecotoxicity. The impacts are reduced when recycling rate is increased. The reduction of cement consumption in disposal processes or the process improvement of cement production may also help to reduce environmental impacts.
机译:当考虑不同的废旧荧光灯(SFL)处理方法(回收和非回收)时,本文介绍了荧光灯的环境影响(长直管36瓦,200 g和13,600 h的平均故障时间)。该研究以生命周期评估(LCA)为工具在泰国进行了病例研究。识别并分析了每个相关过程的所有材料,能源使用以及对环境的污染物排放。对10种潜在环境影响进行了影响评估:致癌物,呼吸器官,无机呼吸器官,气候变化,辐射,臭氧层,生态毒性,酸化/富营养化,土地利用和矿物质。该分析遵循Eco-Indicator 99方法(个人版本2.1)。该研究的主要重点是比较填埋前SFL回收与不回收的影响。间歇性影响活动,原材料生产和所有相关过程中使用的能源都已考虑在内。但是,运输活动被排除在外。结果表明,在所有回收率下,水泥产量是造成环境影响的主要因素,而硫化钠产量第二,电气产量第三。汞蒸气排放对致癌物和生态毒性的贡献很小。增加回收率可减少影响。减少处置过程中的水泥消耗或改善水泥生产的过程也可能有助于减少环境影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号