首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA
【24h】

Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA

机译:影响评估方法对废水处理LCA的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Facing the increase of environmental concern in the water treatment field, stakeholders need reliable decision support tools to assess environmental performances of urban and industrial wastewater systems. To discuss how life cycle assessment (LCA) can be applied to wastewater treatment projects, such an assessment has been performed through a case study on a full-scale plant. Methodological issues that had to be dealt with are briefly exposed. Five life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods have been used: CML 2000, Eco Indicator 99, EDIP 96, EPS and Ecopoints 97. Consistent assessment between these methods has been obtained for greenhouse effect, resources depletion and acidification. Eu-trophication is correctly estimated if one looks at the potential impact of a treatment scenario but not at the characterization of the eutrophication state of a specific receiving stream. Work is needed concerning human toxicity as large discrepancies are noticed between the impact assessment methods.
机译:面对水处理领域日益关注的环境问题,利益相关者需要可靠的决策支持工具来评估城市和工业废水系统的环境绩效。为了讨论如何将生命周期评估(LCA)应用于废水处理项目,已经通过对大型工厂的案例研究进行了这种评估。简要介绍了必须处理的方法论问题。已经使用了五种生命周期影响评估(LCIA)方法:CML 2000,Eco Indicator 99,EDIP 96,EPS和Ecopoints97。对于温室效应,资源枯竭和酸化,这些方法之间已获得一致的评估。如果人们着眼于治疗方案的潜在影响,而不是特定接收流的富营养化状态特征,则可以正确估算富营养化。由于影响评估方法之间存在巨大差异,因此需要开展有关人类毒性的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号