...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Integrated assessment of agronomic, environmental and ecosystem economic benefits of blending use of controlled-release and common urea in wheat production
【24h】

Integrated assessment of agronomic, environmental and ecosystem economic benefits of blending use of controlled-release and common urea in wheat production

机译:在小麦生产中混合使用控制释放和常见尿素的农艺学,环境和生态系统经济效益的综合评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Even though blending controlled-release urea (CRU) with and common urea (CU) has been shown as an effective strategy to improve grain yield and N use efficiency in wheat production, its environmental performance with a life cycle assessment (LCA) and ecosystem economic benefits remain unclear. To evaluate the agronomic, environmental and ecosystem economic performance of blending urea (BU), a field experiment with five N rates (0-300 kg N ha(-1)) and two N fertilizer sources (CU and BU) was carried out in the North China Plain from 2017 to 2019. The results demonstrated that, compared with CU, the one-time application BU before planting maintained the same high grain yield and N uptake in the optimal N treatment (170 kg N ha(-1)) and at higher N rates; and increased the grain yield by 12.6% in the sub-optimal N (Nsub) treatment. The LCA results revealed that BU significantly reduced the life-cycle reactive N (Nr) losses by 16-19% and the N footprint by 14-25%, which were mainly attributed to the reduced N losses through ammonia volatilization (17-20%) and nitrate leaching (18%). BU increased the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission by 4% from N fertilizer production and transportation process, and significantly reduced the GHG emissions generated during the on -field N fertilizer application process by 16-35%, compared to CU. As a result, the overall GHG emission and C footprint were not significantly different between the two fertilizer sources. In contrast, BU reduced the C footprint than CU when fertilizers were applied at sub-optimal N rate. According to the ecosystem economic analysis which considered the costs of both ecosystems and human health, BU improved the ecosystem economic benefit (EEB) than CU except for the farmers' conventional level (300 kg N ha(-1)). The highest EEB was achieved when BU was applied at the optimal level. In summary, application of BU at optimal N rate could not only achieve a high grain yield, but also enhance EEB meanwhile mitigating the negative environmental impacts, and therefore should be considered an effective strategy for sustainable wheat production system. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管混合控制释放尿素(CRU)和常见的尿素(CU)被证明是一种有效的策略,以提高粮食产量和小麦产量的使用效率,其环境性能与生命周期评估(LCA)和生态系统经济福利仍然不清楚。为了评估混合尿素(BU)的农艺,环境和生态系统的经济性能,在进行中进行五个率(0-300kg NU(-1))和两种肥料源(CU和BU)的田间实验2017年至2019年中国华北平原。结果表明,与Cu相比,在种植前的一次性施用Bu保持相同的高谷物产量和最佳N治疗中的N吸收(170kg n(-1))并且在较高的n率;在次优N(NSUB)处理中,将谷物产量增加12.6%。 LCA结果表明,Bu明显将生命周期的活性N(NR)损失显着降低了16-19%,N个占状印迹将通过氨挥发(17-20%)归因于降低的N损失(17-20%) )和硝酸盐浸出(18%)。从N肥料生产和运输过程中增加了4%的温室气体(GHG)排放,并且与Cu相比,在-Field N肥料应用过程中显着降低了在-Field N肥料施用过程中产生的温室气体排放量。结果,两种肥料源之间的总温室气体排放和C足迹在显着差异。相比之下,当施用次优N速率时,Bu减少了C的脚印而不是Cu。根据生态系统经济分析,考虑了生态系统和人类健康的成本,提高了生态系统经济效益(EEB),除CU除外,除了农民的常规水平(300公斤(-1))。在最佳水平施用时,最高的EEB是实现的。总之,Bu以最佳N率的施用不仅可以达到高谷物产量,而且还可以增强EEB,同时减轻负面环境影响,因此应该被认为是可持续小麦生产系统的有效策略。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2021年第10期|125572.1-125572.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Southwest Univ Coll Resources & Environm Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China|Southwest Univ Acad Agr Sci Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China|China Agr Univ Coll Resources & Environm Sci Beijing 100193 Peoples R China|Tech Univ Munich Dept Plant Sci Chair Plant Nutr D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan Germany;

    China Agr Univ Coll Resources & Environm Sci Beijing 100193 Peoples R China;

    Tech Univ Munich Dept Plant Sci Chair Plant Nutr D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan Germany;

    Tech Univ Munich Dept Plant Sci Chair Plant Nutr D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan Germany;

    Southwest Univ Coll Resources & Environm Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China|Southwest Univ Acad Agr Sci Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China|Southwest Univ Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Agr Green Dev Yangtze R Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China;

    Southwest Univ Coll Resources & Environm Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China|Southwest Univ Acad Agr Sci Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China;

    Southwest Univ Coll Resources & Environm Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China|Southwest Univ Acad Agr Sci Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China|Southwest Univ Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Agr Green Dev Yangtze R Chongqing 400716 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Controlled-release urea; Blending urea; Ecosystem economic benefit; Grain yield; Reactive nitrogen losses; Greenhouse gas emission;

    机译:控释尿素;混合尿素;生态系统经济效益;谷物产量;反应性氮损失;温室气体排放;
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号