首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Convergence and club convergence of CO_2 emissions at state levels: A nonlinear analysis of the USA
【24h】

Convergence and club convergence of CO_2 emissions at state levels: A nonlinear analysis of the USA

机译:州水平CO_2排放的收敛和俱乐部收敛性:美国的非线性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study analyses the convergence of CO2 emissions at state-level in the USA for the period from 1976 to 2014 in a nonlinear and novel empirical framework. In so doing, we have applied Pesaran's (2007) test of pair-wise approach to testing convergence which gives in general what are the rejection frequencies and thus provides evidence of convergence. At the aggregate level, we also applied Chi-Young et al. (2006) half-life convergence test and the KPSS test with Fourier transformation which states are converging towards a cross-section average. Finally, we also adopted club convergence approach developed by Phillips and Sul (2007) to identify if the states are converging towards a club and last but not least, we applied Schnurbus et al., 2017 test to find if there is possible evidence if club merging. We make two contributions to the literature: (i) we conduct a country-specific analysis by focusing on the US; (ii) we consider both convergence and club convergence. Our overall results from the Pesaran's (2007) pair-wise approach of convergence indicates that about 35% of the time the null of a unit root is rejected when ADF test is used and about 22% of the time null is rejected when ADF-GLS is used (irrespective of AIC or SBIC criterion). These results are also supported by KPSS stationary test which shows that null is rejected about 70-80% times. However, when Fourier function is incorporated in the KPSS test we find that the null hypothesis of stationarity is rejected only for Florida, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Texas indicating that only these states are non-convergent. Our overall results from club convergence (after club merging) show that USA states are forming 4 clubs. Our findings provide new insight into the convergence of CO2 emissions at the state level in the USA and thus have profound implications in terms of environmental policy setting and Per Capita Emission (PCE) allocations. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究分析了1976年至2014年美国国立水平在非线性和新型实证框架中的二氧化碳排放的融合。在这样做时,我们已经应用了Pesaran的(2007)对测试融合方法的一致性方法测试,这通常是抑制频率是什么,从而提供了收敛的证据。在汇总层面,我们也申请了Chi-Young等人。 (2006)半衰期收敛试验和KPSS测试与傅里叶变换,各种各种往截面平均会聚。最后,我们还通过了菲利普斯和苏尔(2007)开发的俱乐部收敛方法,以确定各国是否朝着俱乐部融合,并持续但常不可是,我们应用了Schnurbus等,2017年测试,以查找是否有可能的证据如果俱乐部可能有证据合并。我们对文献做出了两项贡献:(i)我们通过重点关注美国来进行特定于国家的分析; (ii)我们考虑融合和俱乐部收敛。我们的整体结果来自Pesaran(2007)的成对趋同方法表明,在使用ADF测试时,约35%的时间拒绝单位根的NULL被拒绝,并且在ADF-GLS时拒绝约22%的时间拒绝使用(无论AIC或SBIC标准如何)。这些结果也由KPSS固定试验支持,显示NULL被拒绝约70-80%。然而,当KPSS测试中包含傅立叶功能时,我们发现Suitcharity的空假设仅被拒绝为佛罗里达州,马萨诸塞州,蒙大拿州,内华达州,新墨西哥州,罗德岛,德克萨斯州,表明只有这些国家是非收敛的。我们的俱乐部融合(俱乐部合并后)的整体结果表明,美国各国正在形成4个俱乐部。我们的调查结果为美国国家一级的二氧化碳排放融合提供了新的洞察,因此对环境政策制定和人均排放(PCE)分配的影响深刻。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号