首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Sustainability assessment in circular inter-firm networks: An integrated framework of industrial ecology and circular supply chain management approaches
【24h】

Sustainability assessment in circular inter-firm networks: An integrated framework of industrial ecology and circular supply chain management approaches

机译:循环企业网络中的可持续性评估:工业生态和循环供应链管理方法的综合框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Circular economy has become a central concept of sustainable production and consumption since its introduction into the public eye. However, to ensure circular economy actually delivers on its promises regarding sustainability, it is vital to anticipate and assess the impact of circular economy practices in an integrated way. For that purpose, holistic assessments are crucial to enable transparent decision-making, clearly indicating possible trade-offs. While previous literature has mainly focused on product, company or country level, this paper contributes to an improved understanding of sustainability assessments on the inter-firm level. Given the vital role of inter-firm networks in the transition to a circular economy, the authors present a systematic literature review of sustainability assessment approaches applicable within circular inter-firm networks. These networks are primarily represented in two related fields relevant to circular economy: industrial ecology offers sustainability assessment approaches for inter- and intrasectoral business activities at different scales, whereas circular supply chain management is a promising source for sustainability assessment approaches considering product life cycles. Over 100 academic publications are reviewed and categorised according to assessment type, correspondence to the relevant field, and sustainability dimensions addressed. The results demonstrate that life cycle-based methodologies as well as indicator frameworks, often combined with multi-criteria decision-making methods, are the most common ex-post assessment approaches. Concurrently, the most frequent ex-ante assessments are based on mathematical programming. It is further observed that industrial ecology-related publications present more comprehensive environmental assessments, while circular supply chain management literature includes the social dimension more often, but superficially. Overall, the social dimension is least assessed and least integrated into the sustainability assessment. Based on the findings of the review, an integrated framework of approaches is developed, enabling decision-makers to identify suitable sustainability assessment approaches for circular inter-firm networks. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:自从其进入公众眼中,循环经济已成为可持续生产和消费的核心概念。但是,为了确保循环经济实际上为可持续发展提供了促销的承诺,这对预测和评估了循环经济实践以综合方式的影响至关重要。为此目的,整体评估至关重要,以实现透明决策,清楚地表明可能的权衡。虽然以前的文学主要专注于产品,公司或国家一级,但本文有助于改善对互联互动度的可持续性评估。鉴于企业间网络在向循环经济过渡中的重要作用,作者提出了对适用于循环间网络内的可持续性评估方法的系统文献综述。这些网络主要代表与循环经济相关的两个相关领域:工业生态学提供不同尺度的和跨境业务活动的可持续性评估方法,而循环供应链管理是考虑产品生命周期的可持续性评估方法的有希望的源。根据评估类型​​,与相关领域的通信以及解决的可持续发展尺寸进行审查和分类100多个学术出版物。结果表明,基于生命周期的方法以及指标框架,通常与多标准决策方法相结合,是最常见的前后评估方法。同时,最常见的前蚂蚁评估是基于数学编程。进一步观察到,与工业生态相关的出版物呈现出更全面的环境评估,而循环供应链管理文献更频繁地包括社会维度,而是整齐。总体而言,社会维度最不评估和最不融入可持续发展评估。根据审查的调查结果,制定了综合方法框架,使决策者能够确定圆形公司间网络的合适可持续性评估方法。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号