首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Co-benefit evaluation for urban public transportation sector - a case of Shenyang, China
【24h】

Co-benefit evaluation for urban public transportation sector - a case of Shenyang, China

机译:城市公共交通部门的协同效益评估-以中国沉阳为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Buses and taxies are the most widely used vehicles for urban public transportation in developing countries. They contribute significantly to the emissions of greenhouse gas and air pollutants. Policy makers consider the introduction of new emissions standard vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles in bus and taxi fleets as an attractive measure for reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas and air pollutants. It is important to understand the environmental benefits and economic challenges involved in fleet conversion. However, few studies have been conducted, especially in developing countries. This study analyzes the cost effectiveness and environmental benefits of various vehicles by employing a case study in Shenyang, China. The results showed that CNG bus has the best overall economic and environmental performances, while diesel car is one possible choice for taxi selection when considering the current technology level. Although direct emissions are lower for both hybrid and electricity vehicles, embodied emissions are higher, plus higher costs, making them not suitable as public transportation tools, at least for the current stage. In order to further improve co-benefits in public transportation sector, an integrated effort is needed, including the gradual phase-out of inefficient vehicles, green vehicle purchase, infrastructure improvement and capacity-building initiatives.
机译:公共汽车和出租车是发展中国家城市公共交通使用最广泛的车辆。它们大大增加了温室气体和空气污染物的排放。政策制定者认为,在公共汽车和出租车车队中采用新的排放标准车辆和替代燃料车辆是减少温室气体和空气污染物排放的有吸引力的措施。了解车队转换所涉及的环境利益和经济挑战非常重要。但是,很少进行研究,尤其是在发展中国家。本研究以中国沉阳为例,分析了各种车辆的成本效益和环境效益。结果表明,考虑到当前的技术水平,CNG公交车的整体经济和环境性能最佳,而柴油车则是出租车选择的一种可能选择。尽管混合动力汽车和电动汽车的直接排放都较低,但实际排放却较高,加上成本较高,至少在当前阶段,它们不适合用作公共交通工具。为了进一步改善公共交通部门的共同利益,需要作出综合努力,包括逐步淘汰低效车辆,购买绿色车辆,改善基础设施和能力建设举措。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2013年第1期|82-91|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110016 Shenyang, China;

    Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110016 Shenyang, China,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

    Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110016 Shenyang, China;

    Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110016 Shenyang, China;

    Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110016 Shenyang, China,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;

    National Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Co-benefits; Greenhouse gas; Air pollutants; Public transportation; Cost; Urban area;

    机译:共同利益;温室气体;空气污染物;公共交通工具;成本;市区;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号