首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >The true cost of 'greening' a building: Life cycle cost analysis of vertical greenery systems (VGS) in tropical climate
【24h】

The true cost of 'greening' a building: Life cycle cost analysis of vertical greenery systems (VGS) in tropical climate

机译:“绿化”建筑物的真实成本:热带气候中垂直绿化系统(VGS)的生命周期成本分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Increasing number of building owners is adopting vertical greenery system (VGS) as an alternative to building facades or claddings due to its environmental, aesthetic and social benefits in recent years. While numerous studies have been conducted on its potential benefits and its environmental impacts, there has been little focus on its life-cycle cost (LCC) which is a crucial factor for building owners to adopt a VGS as well as to compare among various types of system. To fill this gap, this study aims to identify and calculate the LCC of 3 main types of VGS available in Singapore, where is the tropical climate, namely the carrier, planter and support systems. The cost incurred during each life-cycle stage including initialisation, installation, operation and demolition, are recorded based on 8 completed and ongoing cases selected in Singapore. The analysis of the results shows that the support system has the lowest life-cycle cost (S$885) followed by planter (S$3,786) and then the carrier system (S$4,919). During the life-cycle, the stage of Operations and Maintenance contributed the most to the LCC of a VGS (73.7-83.9%), while plants related parameters, e.g. plant replacement rate and price, affect the largest variances of LCC. for the support system, the LCC of VGS can be balanced off by building energy cost savings within 30 years, but not for other two systems. Suggestions on selecting VGS types, plants and supporting structures to reduce the cost of VGS have been discussed to conclude the study. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:越来越多的建筑业主正在采用垂直绿化系统(VGS)作为近年来由于其环境,审美和社会效益而构建外墙或熔覆的替代品。虽然已经对其潜在的福利及其环境影响进行了许多研究,但几乎没有关注其生命周期成本(LCC),这是建立所有者采用VGS的所有者以及在各种类型中比较的重要因素系统。为了填补这一差距,本研究旨在识别和计算新加坡的3种主要类型VGS的LCC,热带气候,即载体,播种机和支持系统。在包括初始化,安装,操作和拆迁的每个生命周期阶段发生的成本是根据在新加坡选择的8个已完成的和正在进行的案例记录。结果分析表明,支持系统具有最低的生命周期成本(885澳元),然后是播种机(S $ 3,786),然后是运营机系统(S $ 4,919)。在生命周期期间,运营和维护的阶段为VGS的LCC贡献了最多(73.7-83.9%),而植物相关参数,例如植物相关参数。植物更换率和价格,影响LCC最大的差异。对于支持系统,VGS的LCC可以通过在30年内构建能源成本节省,但不适用于其他两个系统。已经讨论了选择VGS类型,植物和支持结构以降低VGS成本的建议以得出结论。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2019年第10期|437-454|共18页
  • 作者单位

    Natl Univ Singapore Sch Design & Environm Dept Bldg 4 Architecture Dr Singapore 117566 Singapore;

    Tongji Univ Dept Bldg Engn Coll Civil Engn 1239 Siping Rd Shanghai 200092 Peoples R China|Tongji Univ Key Lab Performance Evolut & Control Engn Struct Minist Educ Shanghai 200092 Peoples R China;

    Natl Univ Singapore Sch Design & Environm Dept Bldg 4 Architecture Dr Singapore 117566 Singapore;

    Singapore Bot Gardens Ctr Urban Greenery & Ecol Natl Pk Board 1 Cluny Rd Singapore 259569 Singapore;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Vertical greenery system (VGS); Life-cycle cost; Energy saving; Green buildings; Tropical climate; Green wall;

    机译:垂直绿化系统(VGS);生命周期成本;节能;绿色建筑;热带气候;绿墙;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 22:34:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号